![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
GRISDALE: My connections also been working fine for 2 years on VDSL prior to this issue.
richms: Can someone clarify exactly what chorus mean by multiples?
Basically, instead of having a single pair of wires running continuously along to a sequence of points, when there are multiples on a line, the wires run continuously to a multiple joint, where the cable pair is then connected to two or more cable pairs to carry on, instead of one. It was used to reduce the cost of running the cable out, by ensuring they could make use of the capacity in the cable in a few different potential places, instead of only one place.
Unfortunately, this has a side effect of TRASHING broadband - depending on how long the multiple is, it could cause a dip in performance, or prevent an otherwise fine line of sustaining DSL at all. I'm not sure what the go is in other areas, but here in the Waikato, we don't remove those unless they're in an above ground joint/pillar, which is not very common. The impact is similar to loading coils on the line.
Anything I say is the ramblings of an ill informed, opinionated so-and-so, and not representative of any of my past, present or future employers, and is also probably best disregarded.
richms: And would it be normal that some lines on a pillar have them while others do not?
Yep.
Sometimes only a small part of the group will be in multiple - for instance maybe the first or last 10 pair of a group could be used to feed alternative locations too. There's really no easy way to tell except to look at the records to see which terminals the pair shows up in, or look at the plans to find out roughly where the multiples are, as they can be taken out at any point where a designer decided it seemed to be a good idea.
Jase2985: my question is why are they doing this for a new development? shouldn't they only be doing fiber to new sub divisions? The newer half of Addison in Auckland is fiber only.
its seems ridiculous they would do this not only when they are suppose to be pushing UFB but also the impact to those on the copper network who probably wont get UFB for years to come.
They >SHOULDN'T< have multiples in new developments, if the existing cabling already has them they may or may not be removed, but any new cable installs should only be dedicated cable terminals, or a RLG system.
Anything I say is the ramblings of an ill informed, opinionated so-and-so, and not representative of any of my past, present or future employers, and is also probably best disregarded.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |