Heya everyone,
A bit of a long post here, but thought it may be good to give some context! I've got myself fairly stumped here and would be awesome to get some Geekzone advice.
I'm a first time home owner at a 1950s house. I'm a 29yr old single guy who is quite scared with the amount of debt over my head, and really need to be careful about what I decide to sink money into with the house. Mulling on it all is keeping me awake at night.
I know the way things are with heat and moisture isn't sustainable or healthy though, so I really want to get on to that asap. The first winter in the house is proving a learning experience. We are struggling with it being pretty cold, and quite a bit of condensation on the windows if they aren't left open overnight (which is not appealing when its minus 4!!!)
The house used to be a flat roof, with an arched one put over top of the old bitumen roof.One company thought this would be an issue for going ducted, but 3 others think they can work through it fine, as there is a large roof space above the old roof.
I am living with 2 housemates who are probably what you would call 'room bodies'/ gamer dudes. We all have oil fin heaters in our rooms, and an old heat pump in the lounge that doesn't get much use at the moment, as we aren't out there a lot.
There is an old DVS system at the property with a single vent in the hall, but it is not working at the moment. I had DVS in to look at it, but instead of going up to check what was wrong with it, they tried to upsell a very expensive positive pressure system which i'm not convinced will address my main issues. In any case, with it only having the vent in the hall and being so old, I don't know if its worth getting it serviced.
The main thing I am grappling with is whether to do ducted or with a multi-split system.
The ducted would have vents in all 3 bedrooms, 1 in lounge, 1 in kitchen. With return in the hall. A multi, I would be looking to either only get a 3 head which services the bedrooms, and leave the old heat pump there to be replaced at some point, or replace the lot at once, and use the existing concrete pad where the old pump is. This would avoid having a second external box outside, and the heat pump is pretty old, so am thinking it could be better doing the lot.. If I go ducted, I think it would just be left there till I can afford to do something with it.
With the way we live at the moment, the ability to have further control and only heat parts of the house does appeal. But in saying that, having more central heating I wondered whether it could be healthier over all, and maybe be a bit cleaner and better in terms of resale (as i'm aware the pipe work etc is a bit messy with multi).
I have worries about the power bill with the ducted approach though. And if there are times when really only one room is being used, it seems quite wasteful to have to heat the whole house.
I do like the idea that ducted would keep some more constant air flow going though, which makes me wonder if a separate ventilation system is worth investing in on top of a multi, if I go that route. It all adds up to a lot, and the ducted vs multi seems fairly similar price wise atm, but ventilation on top is a few extra grand.
I've had quotes from a lot of companies now, and I feel a bit bad to have mucked any of them around, but really just trying to make sure I do my due diligence on options. Now i'm completely overwhelmed with info.
At this stage, I think i would like to go with mitsubishi unit. But which option, i'm very lost on.
I'm not usually such an indecisive person, but a bit going on with work and losing my uncle last week, hasn't got me in the best decision making frame of mind.
Any advice would be awesome - though I'm slightly worried posting this about just getting myself more stumped!
Need to just make a call I think.
Thanks everyone.