Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Chorusnz

428 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Chorus

#136800 9-Dec-2013 13:35
Send private message

There has been some discussion in various online forums and the media recently about the performance of some UFB services, in particular that end customers are not getting the full speed that they have purchased. 

At Chorus we thought we might add to the discussion with some insights from our perspective, so here goes:

Why can’t I get 100 Megabits per second downstream speed and 50 Megabits per second upstream speed from my 100/50 UFB fibre service?

LFC’s such as Chorus have designed and built a Layer 2 100/50 service.  This is what we provide to the retail service providers (RSP). The RSP puts their service wrap around it and presents a Layer 3 service to their end-users. The IP protocol overhead required to do this consumes approx 5-10% of the available bandwidth, depending on what is being delivered and how you measure it and what colour the fibre is.  Depending on your type of service wrap, you can expect to “lose” around 5% of your speed when measured at Layer 3.

This is what happens when you test your connection using something like speedtest.net – or any other Layer 3 test service.  Not only that, but Layer 3 speed tests are not actually measuring linespeed, they are using throughput as a proxy for attainable speed.  The speedtest.net platform initiates three separate http sessions to run the test and is sensitive to latency, so distance from the platform will show up in the result.

Another way to look at it is to use the car example. A car that can happily run at 100 kilometres per hour.  You drive from Auckland to Wellington and it takes 10 hours.  The distance from Auckland to Wellington is ~600 kilometres.  Divide distance by time and you get an average travelling speed of ~60 kilometres per hour.  The reason you can’t make the journey in six hours is due to the “overhead” in the network.  The traffic encounters buffers (traffic lights) that holds the traffic for short periods of time until it can be safely forwarded, it encounters congestion  (road works, single lane bridges, limited speed zones etc) which means that 100 kilometres per hour is not possible for some sections of the network.

Another consideration with speed test platforms is the routing from the ISP network to the test server.  Not all traffic travels via the most obvious and direct route.  You may live in Auckland and the test server might be in Wellington, but if the traffic goes via a circuitous route (because it cheaper to do so) then the results will reflect that.  Using our car analogy, if you were to drive from Auckland to Wellington – via Gisborne and Napier – you would never get to Wellington in six hours, no matter what sort of car you owned and regardless of the speed limit.

Distance from you to the speed test server is not necessarily going to make the sort of difference you expect, due to interconnect and routing arrangements between the ISP you are connected to and the ISP that hosts the test server.  For example I live in Wellington and have my service from ISP Y (based in Auckland), they have a speedtest.net server inside their network in Auckland and I experience 90-95% of the rated speed which is what I expect – given that I am 600kilometres from the server.  However, when I select a local Wellington server which is hosted in Network C (i.e. less than 4 kilometres from my home) the speedtest server delivers only 60% of the rated speed.  I can prove that this is not local or national network congestion within my ISPs network by simply switching my test server selection to Canberra Australia where the results come back at 85-90% of my rated speed. 

Potential improvements to your speed test results include some or all of the following (in no particular order);

Raise the speed limit
One way around the problem is to raise the speed limit, the buffers and the congestion will still exist, but where it is safe to do so you can travel faster, meaning you can make up for lost time (i.e. carry more packets on the network for some of the time).  Noting that the speed test platforms are not perfect, they are next to the only thing an end-user can use to test what they have.

Chorus has spent some time analysing what it would take in terms of faster Layer 2 speeds so that once a Layer 3 service is presented to the end-user they experience the speed they think they signed up for.  We are talking to the industry on our next tranche of products and are considering the  release of a 217/57.5 Layer 2 service that will show up for customers as a 200/50 at Layer 3. 

We’re looking at applying this same sort of approach to our suite of UFB services, so for example a revised 100/50 service designed to show 100/50 to the end user would actually be 110/57.5 at the Layer 2 level. We need to coordinate this with our customers (the ISPs) as there will be some config and service management they will need to do, but you can expect something like this to show up in the New Year.

Put Speed test servers inside the ISP network
Instead of routing your traffic onto someone else’s network to perform a test, if your ISP hosted their own server, inside their own network, in your city then we would see the fairest Layer 3 representation of attainable speed – noting the limitations of measuring speed at Layer 3 discussed above.

Select your own ISPs speed test server
Check the default speed test server is the closest to you and that it is inside the same network you are connected to before doing the test.

Hope this goes some way to explaining why measuring broadband speed is problematic and helps put things in perspective.  

^GL

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
Beccara
1469 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

  #948034 9-Dec-2013 13:36
Send private message

*WALLOFTEXT*




Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

 
 
 
 

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).
surfisup1000
5288 posts

Uber Geek


  #948036 9-Dec-2013 13:37
Send private message

Can you edit that to use paragraphs?

Chorusnz

428 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Chorus

#948038 9-Dec-2013 13:39
Send private message

fixed



chevrolux
4962 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #948257 9-Dec-2013 18:36
Send private message

Excellent post. Simple terms and easy to understand. Will be able to point customers to this now rather than waste time explaining why they only get 95Mbps 'but pay for 100'.

Sticky this post I say and add it to PeterReader's spiel!

sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #948270 9-Dec-2013 19:24
Send private message

What Chorus also didn't mention is proposed SLAs on speeds once contention is introduced into the GPON network. These SLAs for example would aim to deliver 77Mbps or greater on 95% of tests.

Ragnor
8196 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #948783 10-Dec-2013 15:49
Send private message

sbiddle: What Chorus also didn't mention is proposed SLAs on speeds once contention is introduced into the GPON network. These SLAs for example would aim to deliver 77Mbps or greater on 95% of tests.


So artificial scarcity in the backhaul network and handovers again?



ubergeeknz
3344 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Vocus

  #948792 10-Dec-2013 15:57
Send private message

Ragnor:
sbiddle: What Chorus also didn't mention is proposed SLAs on speeds once contention is introduced into the GPON network. These SLAs for example would aim to deliver 77Mbps or greater on 95% of tests.

So artificial scarcity in the backhaul network and handovers again?

Nothing artificial about it.  You want guaranteed 100Mbps? You can get it, but not for $140/month.



Ragnor
8196 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #948847 10-Dec-2013 17:07
Send private message

ubergeeknz: 

Nothing artificial about it.  You want guaranteed 100Mbps? You can get it, but not for $140/month.


That's not what I meant.

Remember handover dimensioning on xDSL UBA a few years ago, that was artificial limiting at the exit point despite the traffic having made it it through backhaul network.

Wondering if this will be a similar thing.



Talkiet
4787 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #948849 10-Dec-2013 17:12
Send private message

Ragnor:
ubergeeknz: 

Nothing artificial about it.  You want guaranteed 100Mbps? You can get it, but not for $140/month.


That's not what I meant.

Remember handover dimensioning on xDSL UBA a few years ago, that was artificial limiting at the exit point despite the traffic having made it it through backhaul network.

Wondering if this will be a similar thing.




I'm not sure if the documents describing the proposed new plans are public, but when they are, you should read them. This isn't about 'artificial scarcity'

Cheers - N





Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.


Batman
Mad Scientist
29715 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #948852 10-Dec-2013 17:16
Send private message

for a moment i thought chorus was hitting a speed bump :D

sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #948982 10-Dec-2013 21:21
Send private message

Ragnor:
ubergeeknz: 

Nothing artificial about it.  You want guaranteed 100Mbps? You can get it, but not for $140/month.


That's not what I meant.

Remember handover dimensioning on xDSL UBA a few years ago, that was artificial limiting at the exit point despite the traffic having made it it through backhaul network.

Wondering if this will be a similar thing.




It's very different. GPON is shared infrastructure just like DOCSIS. Handover dimensioning is a completely different thing.

At the end of the day you're paying for a shared experience, not dedicated bandwidth.

I just hope companies like Truenet adapt to the real world realities of best effort residential broadband. Looking forward a few years and contention on the GPON network and people will have to realise that they can't expect to get 500Mbps 24/7 on their (hypothetical) 500Mbps plan.

There are also a number of people out there pushing for 1Gbps to be a standard connection. Anybody asking for such a thing is really sticking their hand up and showing they don't really understand what they're talking about.




1080p
1332 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #949009 10-Dec-2013 22:22
Send private message

sbiddle:
Ragnor:
ubergeeknz: 

Nothing artificial about it.  You want guaranteed 100Mbps? You can get it, but not for $140/month.


That's not what I meant.

Remember handover dimensioning on xDSL UBA a few years ago, that was artificial limiting at the exit point despite the traffic having made it it through backhaul network.

Wondering if this will be a similar thing.




It's very different. GPON is shared infrastructure just like DOCSIS. Handover dimensioning is a completely different thing.

At the end of the day you're paying for a shared experience, not dedicated bandwidth.

I just hope companies like Truenet adapt to the real world realities of best effort residential broadband. Looking forward a few years and contention on the GPON network and people will have to realise that they can't expect to get 500Mbps 24/7 on their (hypothetical) 500Mbps plan.

There are also a number of people out there pushing for 1Gbps to be a standard connection. Anybody asking for such a thing is really sticking their hand up and showing they don't really understand what they're talking about.





How do international ISPs successfully offer gigabit services then?

Talkiet
4787 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #949014 10-Dec-2013 22:28
Send private message

1080p:
sbiddle:
Ragnor:
ubergeeknz: 

Nothing artificial about it.  You want guaranteed 100Mbps? You can get it, but not for $140/month.


That's not what I meant.

Remember handover dimensioning on xDSL UBA a few years ago, that was artificial limiting at the exit point despite the traffic having made it it through backhaul network.

Wondering if this will be a similar thing.




It's very different. GPON is shared infrastructure just like DOCSIS. Handover dimensioning is a completely different thing.

At the end of the day you're paying for a shared experience, not dedicated bandwidth.

I just hope companies like Truenet adapt to the real world realities of best effort residential broadband. Looking forward a few years and contention on the GPON network and people will have to realise that they can't expect to get 500Mbps 24/7 on their (hypothetical) 500Mbps plan.

There are also a number of people out there pushing for 1Gbps to be a standard connection. Anybody asking for such a thing is really sticking their hand up and showing they don't really understand what they're talking about.





How do international ISPs successfully offer gigabit services then?


Well, either they have magic pixie dust not available in New Zealand, or their market expectations and performance are in line with the technology chosen.

Unfortunately anyone with an agenda to push will naturally only ever quote the headline speeds.

I'll just ask this - For any production "gigabit" service offered overseas, do you think there is sufficient access, aggregation and core network built to support everyone downloading at 1Gbps simultaneously, or even 100Mbps?

If your answer is "No, of course not, that's a stupid way to build a network" (BTW that should be your answer), then now all we're arguing about is how much contention is reasonable... AND AT THAT POINT, it all comes back to how much the market is prepared to pay.

Now of course, in New Zealand, we have a fine history of recognising, valuing and paying for higher quality services and goods, and we certainly don't seem to have an incredibly strong focus on price. Hmm, it's either that, or the opposite - I can never remember :-)

Cheers - N





Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.


jarledb
Webhead
3249 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #949034 10-Dec-2013 23:14
Send private message

Chorusnz: 

Chorus has spent some time analysing what it would take in terms of faster Layer 2 speeds so that once a Layer 3 service is presented to the end-user they experience the speed they think they signed up for.  We are talking to the industry on our next tranche of products and are considering the  release of a 217/57.5 Layer 2 service that will show up for customers as a 200/50 at Layer 3. 

We’re looking at applying this same sort of approach to our suite of UFB services, so for example a revised 100/50 service designed to show 100/50 to the end user would actually be 110/57.5 at the Layer 2 level. We need to coordinate this with our customers (the ISPs) as there will be some config and service management they will need to do, but you can expect something like this to show up in the New Year.


This is the right thing to do. Good work!




Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.


jeffreyh
53 posts

Master Geek


  #949049 10-Dec-2013 23:26
Send private message

Cough splutter and your ridculosly small burst settings which are rather TCP unfriendly.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Māori Artists Launch Design Collection with Cricut ahead of Matariki Day
Posted 15-Jun-2025 11:19


LG Launches Upgraded webOS Hub With Advanced AI
Posted 15-Jun-2025 11:13


One NZ Satellite IoT goes live for customers
Posted 15-Jun-2025 11:10


Bolt Launches in New Zealand
Posted 11-Jun-2025 00:00


Suunto Run Review
Posted 10-Jun-2025 10:44


Freeview Satellite TV Brings HD Viewing to More New Zealanders
Posted 5-Jun-2025 11:50


HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14-inch Review
Posted 3-Jun-2025 14:40


Flip Phones Are Back as HMD Reimagines an Iconic Style
Posted 30-May-2025 17:06


Hundreds of School Students Receive Laptops Through Spark Partnership With Quadrent's Green Lease
Posted 30-May-2025 16:57


AI Report Reveals Trust Is Key to Unlocking Its Potential in Aotearoa
Posted 30-May-2025 16:55


Galaxy Tab S10 FE Series Brings Intelligent Experiences to the Forefront with Premium, Versatile Design
Posted 30-May-2025 16:14


New OPPO Watch X2 Launches in New Zealand
Posted 29-May-2025 16:08


Synology Premiers a New Lineup of Advanced Data Management Solutions
Posted 29-May-2025 16:04


Dyson Launches Its Slimmest Vaccum Cleaner PencilVac
Posted 29-May-2025 15:50


OPPO Reno13 Pro 5G Review 
Posted 29-May-2025 15:33









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.







Backblaze unlimited backup