Fred99:
I won't argue about the advantages of double glazing, but there is one serious disadvantage. The units have a finite life - as my next door neighbour has found out, a $25k cost to replace all double-glazed units about 20 years old - many were failing (internal condensation). A conventional window lifespan is indefinite - subject to maintenance of the frame etc. So the final calculation may not be as simple as subtracting energy cost saved over the additional cost of double glazing, though there is an intangible comfort factor (incl reduced noise).
If building or renovating - I'd be asking a lot of questions about durability/lifespan of the various systems available before stumping up with a serious amount of cash. I'm not sure about the double glazed panels themselves, but there are some very dodgy operators (and no doubt many very good ones too) in the double-glazing/aluminium joinery business.
That is interesting, and not something you hear much about, and not something the windows companies tell you about. Do you know if laminated glass lasts much longer? Under the NZBC I believe regular non structural windows only have to have a life of 15 years, which isn't long at all. I think it should be 25. Insulated glazing units though should last longer than 20 years, but I guess it depends on the quality of them, and the exposure of them to the elements and sun. I am guessing sun could perish the seal between the pieces of glass. I would hope the technology today is better than that used 20 years ago. If people really want good performance, triple glazing is excellent, but not sure how much it is used in NZ. Replacing sealants and seals is a huge business, which is where conventional lap joints have the advantage in terms of longevity,