![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
can someone explain why prices will fall 18-32 cents a litre if retailers are forced to show price , i dont get it my local already shows all it's prices and has since it started and i havent seen one station that doesnt show prices, what am i missing.
Common sense is not as common as you think.
vexxxboy:
can someone explain why prices will fall 18-32 cents a litre if retailers are forced to show price , i dont get it my local already shows all it's prices and has since it started and i havent seen one station that doesnt show prices, what am i missing.
[edit] - Ignore the above
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12291251
"Although the Government does not appear to have any concrete estimates, Faafoi estimates the drop could be within that 18c-32c a litre price range."
It seems this estimate is being made my Consumer Affairs Minister Kris Faafoi, without proper analytical backing. Notice the use of word "could", rather than "is expected to be"
vexxxboy:
can someone explain why prices will fall 18-32 cents a litre if retailers are forced to show price , i dont get it my local already shows all it's prices and has since it started and i havent seen one station that doesnt show prices, what am i missing.
It petrol fell 32c from the "national" price it would be selling for below cost based on MBIE data.
I'm all for full disclosure of fuel prices. The fuel companies should also put up a display showing how much tax they collect per litre for the govt. Full disclosure and all that.
DarthKermit:
I'm all for full disclosure of fuel prices. The fuel companies should also put up a display showing how much tax they collect per litre for the govt. Full disclosure and all that.
Why?
The tax component of fuel already fully disclosed, anybody interested can find it with a quick google search:
The point of the additional signage for higher octane fuel is to increase competition, for these grades, as abnormal high profit margins are being charged on these grades compared to 91RON.
What about the fact that so few places sell 95 now, so those that do only bother being slightly below the 98 options at BP and mobil?
I hope that their ideas of fuel stickers so people know what to use doesnt amount to "it doesn't grenade the engine on 91, so thats the sticker we will use"
Tax on petrol is super irrelevant in this case. It's about how much profit the private companies are making. Removing the tax doesn't remove the profit margin.
I think part of the problem is that some people can get really good discounts for you have a card, or you buy through a super market etc. So not everyone is benefiting from that. Also how the pricing can vary so much depending on whether or not there are the more aggressive disruptive players operating in the market or not. I would like to see them do the same for building products as that is costing the country significantly with our very high build costs.
Scott3:The point of the additional signage for higher octane fuel is to increase competition, for these grades, as abnormal high profit margins are being charged on these grades compared to 91RON.
Senecio: I’m a proud supporter of Gull. They have two self serve stations near me that are usually between 8-12c cheaper than any of the majors in the area negating the need to stuff around with discounts or loyalty programs.
I pass a Gull every day. They seem to suffer from bipolar—sometimes they're cheaper than the BP/Caltex up the road but sometimes they're more expensive (up to 10c more). I found out recently from a friend that on Thursdays the pump price at that particular station is usully 6c cheaper than the price shown on the board—I have taken advantage of this twice. Very strange strategy which results in an empty Gull station most days while BP/Caltex has queues because most people can get BP/Caltex cheaper than Gull just by having the appropriate card.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |