|
|
|
MikeB4:frankv:timmmay: "Hey, we're going to enforce the speed limit". Seems reasonable.
Assuming of course that the speed limit is set at a reasonable value.
That is irrelevant, the legal maximum is 100KM/H
myopinion: I never go over 100
frankv:MikeB4:frankv:timmmay: "Hey, we're going to enforce the speed limit". Seems reasonable.
Assuming of course that the speed limit is set at a reasonable value.
That is irrelevant, the legal maximum is 100KM/H
So you support the idea of enforcing unreasonable laws?
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
simon14: IMO it should be a 1kmph speed tolerance.
Stay UNDER the speed limit, not directly on it
keewee01:timmmay: "Hey, we're going to enforce the speed limit". Seems reasonable.
But do you not find it interesting that it is only the road rules, in particular the speed limit (which collect revenue) that the Police regularly campaign on and not any of the other New Zealand laws (which coincidentally don't earn any revenue). To me this completely lacks credibility because of their lack of action across all other parts of their jobs except for where they really have to act. I am a big supporter of our Police, but IMO I think the powers-that-by as misguided on prioroties.

Geektastic:With di**heads like that being allowed to share the road with me and mine, I am more than happy for the Police to raise as much revenue from them as humanly possible.
Geektastic:keewee01:timmmay: "Hey, we're going to enforce the speed limit". Seems reasonable.
But do you not find it interesting that it is only the road rules, in particular the speed limit (which collect revenue) that the Police regularly campaign on and not any of the other New Zealand laws (which coincidentally don't earn any revenue). To me this completely lacks credibility because of their lack of action across all other parts of their jobs except for where they really have to act. I am a big supporter of our Police, but IMO I think the powers-that-by as misguided on prioroties.
Seems more like a reasonable argument for a minimum $1000 fine for all infringements, speeding or otherwise.
I wrote to the Transport Minister to enquire why the fine for jumping red lights was a mere $150 - less than I spend in New World in a week - when it is a potentially fatal action. I invited him to install red light cameras on every set of lights in New Zealand with a fine of at least $500 for each infringement.
Response was some vagueness about 'looking into it' and 'reviewing the level of fines' IIRC.
I watched Highway Patrol earlier tonight and they pinched two car loads of absolute morons with a collective IQ of less than a whole number for racing at 148kmh on the public highway - and the drivers had the temerity to lose their tempers because their licences were suspended on the spot.
With di**heads like that being allowed to share the road with me and mine, I am more than happy for the Police to raise as much revenue from them as humanly possible.
MikeB4:frankv:MikeB4:frankv:timmmay: "Hey, we're going to enforce the speed limit". Seems reasonable.
Assuming of course that the speed limit is set at a reasonable value.
That is irrelevant, the legal maximum is 100KM/H
So you support the idea of enforcing unreasonable laws?
I comply with the law
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
alasta:Geektastic:With di**heads like that being allowed to share the road with me and mine, I am more than happy for the Police to raise as much revenue from them as humanly possible.
The problem is that they never actually pay the fines because they have no money.

joker97:Geektastic:keewee01:timmmay: "Hey, we're going to enforce the speed limit". Seems reasonable.
But do you not find it interesting that it is only the road rules, in particular the speed limit (which collect revenue) that the Police regularly campaign on and not any of the other New Zealand laws (which coincidentally don't earn any revenue). To me this completely lacks credibility because of their lack of action across all other parts of their jobs except for where they really have to act. I am a big supporter of our Police, but IMO I think the powers-that-by as misguided on prioroties.
Seems more like a reasonable argument for a minimum $1000 fine for all infringements, speeding or otherwise.
I wrote to the Transport Minister to enquire why the fine for jumping red lights was a mere $150 - less than I spend in New World in a week - when it is a potentially fatal action. I invited him to install red light cameras on every set of lights in New Zealand with a fine of at least $500 for each infringement.
Response was some vagueness about 'looking into it' and 'reviewing the level of fines' IIRC.
I watched Highway Patrol earlier tonight and they pinched two car loads of absolute morons with a collective IQ of less than a whole number for racing at 148kmh on the public highway - and the drivers had the temerity to lose their tempers because their licences were suspended on the spot.
With di**heads like that being allowed to share the road with me and mine, I am more than happy for the Police to raise as much revenue from them as humanly possible.
Thanks to your suggestion I found something to do tonight - watch Highway Patrol!
4 Nov episode - car was too loud coz it sounds too loud. No dB meter needed. "It was legal for the shop to fit aftermarket exhaust, but illegal for the owner to drive it." (the words of the officer!) Lucky I sold my car with an aftermarket exhaust. It was pretty loud! I was always wondering what the laws were around that.
EDIT: hmm Aussie show oops

Geektastic:alasta:Geektastic:With di**heads like that being allowed to share the road with me and mine, I am more than happy for the Police to raise as much revenue from them as humanly possible.
The problem is that they never actually pay the fines because they have no money.
Easy. Every $100 outstanding after 28 days is a month in prison and your car is sold to repay the fines as well.
|
|
|