shk292:
Fred99:
I don't have that wrong, and a huge amount of power is wasted and a lot of heat generated, hence separate heat exchanger for oil-cooling for slushbox autos by way of either separate radiator, heat exchanger for the auto trans fluid built into the main coolant radiator, or compact separate fluid to fluid heat exchanger mounted on the side of modern slushbox autos (looks a bit like an oil filter, but plumbed to engine coolant system).
That's why they use lock-up clutches since the '90s - and in the case of recent Mazda SkyActiv, lock-up in all forward gears, as the energy waste from the torque converter is substantial. Now Mazda have to deal with all the extra crap (wear particles and heat) from the slip on the clutches engaging and disengaging much more as that's happening with every shift in every ratio, so much larger and more expensive torque converter with bigger clutches, trans oil filtration and very very important service intervals. So far they seem to be okay - and IMO a good alternative for a fuel efficient auto for around town commuting, where I don't like DSG much, and don't trust CVTs based on their shocking history.
It's also why DSG and CVT became common - as they're much more efficient than conventional slush-box. (in the case of DSG then even faster acceleration times than manual transmission because the shifts are slicker/better timed than a human can achieve, more economical than manual because computers are smarter than humans at crunching numbers to work out the best time to shift ratio)
I stand corrected - and I have just found out that the six-speed auto box in my car has lock-up in all but first, which explains how it behaves
It's a shame that CVT isn't more reliable because it should be the perfect system.
I don't stand corrected (yet). All the info I can find about 97 Nissan Pulsars has them fitted with Jatco RL4F03A 4 speed autos with lockup available when in 4th not in place of 4th.