Fred99:
frankv:
joker97:
on the news the other day, Apple's NZ tax payment for 2016 was $0.00000
Prezactly. My feeling is that if Apple pays no tax in NZ, they should get no benefit from the things that taxes provide. Like police protecting their stores, Customs processing their goods, courts protecting their IP, etc.
So NZ should pay tax in the US for selling burger beef, in the UK for selling lamb, and in China for selling milk powder?
IMO the "problem" - if there is one - is that Apple tend to not pay much tax at all - anywhere. On that basis, the most ripped-off of all is probably California.
You seem to have misconstrued Apple as a country.
So my answer is No... it is the *company* that is selling NZ beef in the US that should pay tax on their profits in the US.
I agree again... yes, the problem is that Apple has set themselves up to not pay any tax anywhere, except Ireland where they pay minimal tax.
