![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jeeves: My lord, the cynicism in this thread is huge. How dare a new company try and do things differently.
Geektastic:Jeeves: My lord, the cynicism in this thread is huge. How dare a new company try and do things differently.
They aren't - they are just copying what others have already done.
Usury is usury, whatever name you give the website!
Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?
Geektastic: It's interesting that there appears (and I may be wrong) to be no law against usury and loan sharking in NZ.
The first anti-usury laws in the UK were enacted in the 1600's!
I'm not sure why we collectively appear to be happy for such activities to take place.
Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?
Geektastic: It's interesting that there appears (and I may be wrong) to be no law against usury and loan sharking in NZ.
The first anti-usury laws in the UK were enacted in the 1600's!
I'm not sure why we collectively appear to be happy for such activities to take place.
Jeeves:Geektastic: It's interesting that there appears (and I may be wrong) to be no law against usury and loan sharking in NZ.
The first anti-usury laws in the UK were enacted in the 1600's!
I'm not sure why we collectively appear to be happy for such activities to take place.
http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/legislation-policy/changes-to-credit-laws
Geektastic:Jeeves:Geektastic: It's interesting that there appears (and I may be wrong) to be no law against usury and loan sharking in NZ.
The first anti-usury laws in the UK were enacted in the 1600's!
I'm not sure why we collectively appear to be happy for such activities to take place.
http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/legislation-policy/changes-to-credit-laws
Well, some improvement is better than none but I'd hardly describe a voluntary code as much of a useful thing in this context.
Where are the legal proscriptions on interest rates, for example?
Fred99:Geektastic:Jeeves: My lord, the cynicism in this thread is huge. How dare a new company try and do things differently.
They aren't - they are just copying what others have already done.
Usury is usury, whatever name you give the website!
I guess as the business is P2P, then it's "facilitating" usury.
I don't "get" the business model:
"We target a prime bank grade customer that has got good credit and can afford to repay the loan, so we are declining probably 70-80% of applications right now," Roberts said.
"Prime bank grade" customers don't need Harmoney P2P lending at high interest rates - they can borrow money much more cheaply from a bank.
Out of the 20-30% of applications "approved", presumably some are paying the 39% rate cited - IMO this is at an end of the market where you're lending money to people who should not be borrowing money. They also cop a massive risk-free 14% premium on those loans.
Actually - I suspect I do "get" the business model. They avoid prudential regulation which applies to banks/finance companies, assume no risk by facilitating P2P borrowing for people who shouldn't be borrowing money anyway. This in a market with low interest rates and ease of borrowing (and hence unprecedented high levels of consumer debt) suggests to me that they're preying on the vulnerable on both sides of the equation.
mdf:Geektastic:Jeeves:Geektastic: It's interesting that there appears (and I may be wrong) to be no law against usury and loan sharking in NZ.
The first anti-usury laws in the UK were enacted in the 1600's!
I'm not sure why we collectively appear to be happy for such activities to take place.
http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/legislation-policy/changes-to-credit-laws
Well, some improvement is better than none but I'd hardly describe a voluntary code as much of a useful thing in this context.
Where are the legal proscriptions on interest rates, for example?
There aren't any. An interest rate cap has been proposed several times, but the government/officials have always vetoed it on the basis that it acts as the default interest rate everyone will charge (for the worst borrowers, at least). Though the counter argument that it is better charging everyone - say - 60% rather than 600%.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |