![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Sony doesn't sell the adapter btw, Logitech does, so it wasn't a revenue thing. Maybe it's a cost thing, given how few people would use it.
Jaxson: Maybe the PS3 is the future and the IR is a legacy component now given it has bluetooth on board. But yeah, a real pain given every TV and Receiver has IR.
JimmyH: I got the 785 a while ago - love the remote, hate the PC software that came with it.
Once I have thew remote configured, I don't need to attach it to the PC unless I change the configuration. But the software insists on installing components and services that run whenever the PC starts up, and persistently trying to connect to the internet. Manually killing all that was a PITA.
jpollock: I bought a harmony, it sucks. It sucks on many different levels.
1) It requires a web service to configure the device.
2) It doesn't know about all my remotes.
3) It doesn't do key repetition properly.
4) The support organisation are, as has been noted, muppets.
I've got three remotes (TV, stereo, media PC), and the WAF is pretty low, so I decided to get a Harmony. First up, the software on the PC is horrid. Pretty much the worst UI you could ever come up with for setting up a remote control. Next the software is web based. You can't program your remote control without an Internet connection. There are no save files on your local machine to look at, nothing. It is all stored with Logitech.
Finally, I had problems with one of the remotes. First, it detected it as a previous version so all of the keys were wrong. No problem, I'll program it manually.
Problem - When hand-programming a repeating key, it....inserts....a....1....second....pause...between....each....keypress, for no real reason. This pause is not configurable like the regular pauses are. Since there is no local save file, you can't hand-edit the save file to fix it yourself. It makes the remote unusable for, say, scrolling down lists - like recorded TV shows, TV channel lists, etc.
So, now I've got a $200 paperweight, and I would never, ever recommend a logitech harmony remote.
If they created a local XML file that I could edit and then upload? I'd be moderately satisfied and say, "Their UI sucks, but they're a keyboard manufacturer". If they allowed me to edit the signals by hand? I'd say "Meh, at least they let me fix the problem, sounds about right for a bunch of driver developers".
As it stands, this is more locked down than a Tivo. At least the Tivo lets you read the source code for the bugs you can't fix.
jpollock: I bought a harmony, it sucks. It sucks on many different levels.
1) It requires a web service to configure the device.
2) It doesn't know about all my remotes.
3) It doesn't do key repetition properly.
4) The support organisation are, as has been noted, muppets.
I've got three remotes (TV, stereo, media PC), and the WAF is pretty low, so I decided to get a Harmony. First up, the software on the PC is horrid. Pretty much the worst UI you could ever come up with for setting up a remote control. Next the software is web based. You can't program your remote control without an Internet connection. There are no save files on your local machine to look at, nothing. It is all stored with Logitech.
Finally, I had problems with one of the remotes. First, it detected it as a previous version so all of the keys were wrong. No problem, I'll program it manually.
Problem - When hand-programming a repeating key, it....inserts....a....1....second....pause...between....each....keypress, for no real reason. This pause is not configurable like the regular pauses are. Since there is no local save file, you can't hand-edit the save file to fix it yourself. It makes the remote unusable for, say, scrolling down lists - like recorded TV shows, TV channel lists, etc.
So, now I've got a $200 paperweight, and I would never, ever recommend a logitech harmony remote.
If they created a local XML file that I could edit and then upload? I'd be moderately satisfied and say, "Their UI sucks, but they're a keyboard manufacturer". If they allowed me to edit the signals by hand? I'd say "Meh, at least they let me fix the problem, sounds about right for a bunch of driver developers".
As it stands, this is more locked down than a Tivo. At least the Tivo lets you read the source code for the bugs you can't fix.
Lizard1977: Thanks everyone. So far, I count about 3 people favouring the 785 over the One, but mostly because of the coloured buttons. It looks like the 785 is harder to find, though. Does anyone want to speak in favour of the One over the 785?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |