chiefie: SBiddle. that's what I thought too.. HDMI has the HDCP implement in them... I was a bit unsure with what Sky's announcement is about.
Though you do get a lot of people that not knowing HD Ready tv is really HDMI available on the set. However, not all manufacturer do provide HDMI, and i still see Sony's Bravia provides VGA input for their Bravia mid range, instead of HDMI... surprised me...
Glad my Philips has HDMI... wish it has dual HDMI inputs though.. hmmm...
Also, how can one make use of the HDMI's audio input?
I think the retailers and the manufacturers to a certain extent have classified a set as HD ready as being able to display with full resolution, the two primary HD standard signals, 720p and 1080i. Note that many LCD panels can't even do that since they are 1024x768. Any lots of the 42" panels out there are are only 852x? or EDTV resolution.
As for having HDCP compliant inputs, they could argue that this is not a requirement for a set to be HD ready. For example if TVNZ or TV3 decide to transmit HD content either OTA (unlikely given the cost that BCL would incur to ensure the signal could be reached all over NZ) or via satellite or in the case of TV3 over cable, there is nothing to stop them providing a set top box that has HDMI or DVI outputs without HDCP and or component output. So how could the consumer complain about one provider's implementation in this case Sky?
Also my understanding from the reviews that the first HD-DVD players from Toshiba in the US don't implement HDCP or even the ICT so any HD ready set with component inputs will get full resolution.