Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
Daza

10 posts

Wannabe Geek


  #85131 3-Sep-2007 18:51
Send private message

I think when you look more closely at the specs, you'll find that you get slightly more than a non-reflective screen for $500.  It has a much better speaker system (with  twin subwoofers and tweeters), twin tuners (PIP/PAT/PAP), a better processor, SD card slot, 3 HDMI inputs.

Daza




Daza

10 posts

Wannabe Geek


  #85134 3-Sep-2007 18:53
Send private message

PS - I do agree that the 70 looks a little cleaner (with the Pioneer frame looking the best).

Has any one seen the Panisonic 700 for less than $3000?

Daza

parosser
21 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  #85964 9-Sep-2007 15:54
Send private message

Hi,

I'm also interested in the 42PV700AZ. One thing i can't seem to figure out (probably due to my lack of understanding!) is if this model is HDCP compliant. And if it's not, does it really matter?

Anyone have some advice on this?

Many thanks.



cyril7
9075 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #86035 10-Sep-2007 06:35
Send private message

Yes it is HDCP complient,  at this date it would be suicide for any display manufacturer to produce a HD display without being.

Cyril

robbonz
1 post

Wannabe Geek


  #88795 30-Sep-2007 21:45
Send private message



JB (Lynnmall Auckland) have the 700 for $2989 with stand an optional extra

Stand (TY-ST42D2-WS) $300 but appears there are none in NZ

I ordered a 700 and stand from Hill & Stewart (who matched JB price - both companies have same owners quoting staff) as they lent me a 42" Toshiba LCD (hope watching sport on plasma better) until delivery of Panasonic

my first geek post - now off to read up on blackberry's...

stuzzo
534 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  #88813 30-Sep-2007 22:41
Send private message





What point is there upscaling SD content to 1080p on a set that only has a 1024x768 native resolution? 1080p support on any set that isn't a full HD 1920x1080 is nothing but a kludge.



I have a 720 pixel projector (Sanyo) that accepts a 1080p signal . The picture is noticeably better when the input signal is 1080p as opposed to the same source at 720p. There could be a number of reasons for it.

Another consideration is if you are distributing signals from one source to a number of displays it is handy to be able to work at one resolution eg 1080i or p and have that signal accepted by all the displays rather than having to change output settings to watch a particular display.

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.