![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
http://www.amazon.com/ViewHD-Multi-functional-Converter-Support-Surround/dp/B004K61QAS
JimmyH: I am actually surprised that no one has trued to cater for that market by releasing an box with a ton of legacy ports in (multiple composite, component, VGA), a remote control, and HDMI out.
There's probably a good market for that. Not all of which is cheap-ass people with old equipment. Some will be gamin enthusiasts who want to keep old kit connected. Plus, for instance, I know businesses that still spec VGA for new displays/projectors in conference rooms, to ensure that anyone who turns up with a laptop etc for a presentation can deliver it. People in both of these markets would presumably pay a reasonable sum for a solution, and I would have thought there was enough for a niche.
(And yes, I know there are individual converters available, but one that added the lot, plus a couple of extra HDMI ports for good measure, would be quite useful. I also know done HT amps will do this, but I'm talking abut a straight all-in-one converter box).
bfginger: Something like this?
http://www.amazon.com/ViewHD-Multi-functional-Converter-Support-Surround/dp/B004K61QAS
JimmyH: ^^^
Yes, I understand that.
I'm more interested in connecting some legacy AV kit and consoles than a VGA connector, which is the one port that I will personally never use.
joker97: .....vinyl came back because people want to pay money for it and like old character sound.
i am not sure if there will be a group of loaded VGA-philes who will splash $1000 for a gold plated VGA cable
ET: "Maybe; you have some freewill, but you chose your path by arrangement"
Me "That sounds like a program with no freewill?"
ET: "We will catch up when you end this cycle"
Me: "Sounds like a 'KPI'!"
ET: "Did you read the terms and conditions?"
Me: .....
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic: One thing that bothers me about this discussion is the implication that customers *should* prefer HDMI over VGA or something else modern over something else legacy because the one is new and better and the other is old. For me the issue is not which is better quality, or more up to date, or whatever, but customer choice. If I am the one paying the money, and I want VGA, why shouldn't I be able to get it? I don't care if HDMI is better or more modern. VGA happens to suit my specific requirements better.
Rikkitic: One thing that bothers me about this discussion is the implication that customers *should* prefer HDMI over VGA or something else modern over something else legacy because the one is new and better and the other is old. For me the issue is not which is better quality, or more up to date, or whatever, but customer choice. If I am the one paying the money, and I want VGA, why shouldn't I be able to get it? I don't care if HDMI is better or more modern. VGA happens to suit my specific requirements better.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |