richms: I have tried paying in the past with a printed bill, and since my inkjet was half blocked and there were lines on the barcode it wouldnt scan and they basically refused to take my money.
They pay more of a % for a post shop payment than a credit card so its strange that postshop and posted bill remains free. Im off telecom now since their whole billing system is retarded and it would take a hell of a lot to get me back with them and their arcane practices and systems.
My guess would be the pr risk of charging for post shop is too high.
With post shop, there are probably a bunch of old biddies who only ever use cash and so charging them for the privilege of paying via post shop hen they can't pay any other way because they don't have a bank account or use the Internet or something, would generate a lot of negative pr.
With the way it currently stands by charging for credit card then people who complain about it aren't that big a deal since it is super easy to pay via online banking or direct debit which does not incur a charge and isnt really any less convenient than redit card, apart from you wont accrue hotpoints or whatever.
That is why I just don't understand the big deal over the whole thing. Why not just change to one of those two methods and avoid the fee?
No doubt if telecoms standard pricing was $2 higher but they offered a $2 discount for paying via direct debit or post shop there wouldn't be this outrage, despite the effect being absolutely identical in every way.