![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
mruane: Well Paul, it seems to me that for someone who visits the US regularly (as I do), my best bet is to just leave my NZ sim card at home and buy a US T-Mobile or Cingular prepaid SIM for use in the US. I can purchase a T-Mobile Sim over the net for $US25 which provides 150 minutes anywhere in the US say US0.16.c/min ie NZ0.25c/min.
Your $3 + local calling rate does not sound too good in comparison to me - unless I am missing something.
Mike
Most of our roamers don't make many local calls in their new destination. By far the majority of call minutes spent by Vodafone NZ customers roaming overseas is taken up with calls back home. As such, we configured the plan to make that simple and more affordable.
In your case, however, I think you're saying you spend most of your time in one location and make most of your calls locally within that country. In that case, as I've said elsewhere, you might be better off staying with the existing plan or, as you've pointed out, choosing another option. There may be benefits to buying a SIM overseas but there are also issues, as Mauricio pointed out earlier.
It's a fine balancing act getting price points that are the most cost effective while at the same time making the pricing plan as easy to use as possible, particularly when we're constrained by other companies and what they want to charge. The research we've done says emphatically that customers who travel want simplicity, so that's what we've strived to deliver.
I've just sent a chart of five top destinations to TUANZ so they can see what we're trying to do. Once they've posted it I'll post it here as well so you can compare the old rates with the new. Yes, there are some anomalies but overall I think we're delivering what the customers have asked for: cost effective service with a simple tariff plan.
Cheers
Paul
Paul Spain
Founder: Gorilla Technology, NZ Tech Podcast
VNZ:
The text price (80c) is an approximate average of the various rates to send text messages previously.
suthland:VNZ:
The text price (80c) is an approximate average of the various rates to send text messages previously.
Would love to see this calculation, certainly not an average (weighted) of high use locations ie Australia, UK & US.
80 cents for a Text from Australia is the communication's version of "Usury"
Internet is my backyard...
«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»
Please read the Geekzone's FUG
chiefie: I'm still a bit puzzled or confused with this Traveller plan, I know it is an opt-in, can one opt-in and opt-out at will (prior to leaving NZ of course) between existing plan and Traveller plan?
Thank you for your kind welcome to Geekzone Paul, I have read these forums for a couple of years but this is the first issue that has annoyed me enough to Register and post.
As the External Communications Manager for Vodafone you are trying to convince us that these changes are all about "Simplicity and Certainty" for your customers and as far as voice calls are concerned I can accept your argument, given that they are an opt-in choice.
Where I believe your credibility is stretched is the issue of Text messages, you tell us that "The text price (80c) is an approximate average of the various rates to send text messages previously" then you start quoting Iceland @ $1.94. (I wonder how many of those you get each year compared to Australia & the UK, which you fail to mention at all)
Is it not more credible that your Text price has been arrived at after reviewing your only effective NZ competitors new roaming price structure, which also appears to be "coincidently" 80 cents per text worldwide?
Why have customers not been given the same option to opt-in to the new SMS pricing structure?, as with the voice calls, or has Vodafone spotted a nice little commercial opportunity to lift its SMS income from high use locations while trying to camouflage the significant increases as "Simplicity & Certainty" ,and pointing out the benefits if you are travelling to Iceland ! What about Moldova? the surcharge is only 20 cent there and it's probably as popular as Iceland.
Vodafone indicates it high use roaming Countries itself when you search "Where can I roam?" on your website as the UK, USA & Australia are group together at the top of the list for easy access no doubt because they are the most commonly used.
I have no problem with a Company making fair & reasonable return on their investment but when we have a duo-monopoly arriving at a cartel like price for a service and then try and slip it through as major benefit for customers (the one’s that shouldn’t be allowed to use a mobile overseas) I get grumpy.
Why is there no opt-in option for SMS as there is with Voice calling?
An upfront answer as opposed to the "spin doctor version" would be appreciated.
suthland:Thank you for your kind welcome to Geekzone Paul, I have read these forums for a couple of years but this is the first issue that has annoyed me enough to Register and post.
As the External Communications Manager for Vodafone you are trying to convince us that these changes are all about "Simplicity and Certainty" for your customers and as far as voice calls are concerned I can accept your argument, given that they are an opt-in choice.Where I believe your credibility is stretched is the issue of Text messages, you tell us that "The text price (80c) is an approximate average of the various rates to send text messages previously" then you start quoting Iceland @ $1.94. (I wonder how many of those you get each year compared to Australia & the UK, which you fail to mention at all)
Is it not more credible that your Text price has been arrived at after reviewing your only effective NZ competitors new roaming price structure, which also appears to be "coincidently" 80 cents per text worldwide?
Why have customers not been given the same option to opt-in to the new SMS pricing structure?, as with the voice calls, or has Vodafone spotted a nice little commercial opportunity to lift its SMS income from high use locations while trying to camouflage the significant increases as "Simplicity & Certainty" ,and pointing out the benefits if you are travelling to Iceland ! What about Moldova? the surcharge is only 20 cent there and it's probably as popular as Iceland.
Vodafone indicates it high use roaming Countries itself when you search "Where can I roam?" on your website as the UK, USA & Australia are group together at the top of the list for easy access no doubt because they are the most commonly used.
I have no problem with a Company making fair & reasonable return on their investment but when we have a duo-monopoly arriving at a cartel like price for a service and then try and slip it through as major benefit for customers (the one’s that shouldn’t be allowed to use a mobile overseas) I get grumpy.
Why is there no opt-in option for SMS as there is with Voice calling?
An upfront answer as opposed to the "spin doctor version" would be appreciated.
I think he's more interested to know how two competing companies with completely different service structures, technologies, etc - which should lead to different service costs, managed to get to the same price?
Is this the case of "if people are prepared to pay up to $.80 to Telecom, let's up our price too" or is this really a true competition environment?
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
PaulBrislen: Customers CAN opt in or opt out - as I've said. It's not a matter of opting in for TXT versus opting in for Voice - it's all or nothing.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |