freitasm:DizzyD:freitasm:
It makes me feel Windows 10 is not finished, by a long way. We are basically involved in one of the largest beta in the world. This isn't good.
Has there ever been a Windows OS that has been any different? I cant help but think back to the days of Win 95, Windows ME, Vista, and that awful first drop of the dreadful Windows 8. Granted XP and Windows 7 have probably rated as the best. But I think for completeness Windows 10 is right up there with XP and 7. In fact I'm having less problems with 10 than I ever had on XP or Win7.
So there is now patch which is missing its release notes.
Hopefully the release notes are published soon. In the meantime if you worried about it, simply don't install it.
I think Windows XP and Windows 7 were very well polished. The monthly updates were bug fixes, and that's understandable. Windows 8 was a disaster in terms of UI and UX. Windows 10 is nicely done but lots of small things that require a few more clicks than before, are harder to find, not in the most intuitive places. That's what I mean by "not finished".MikeB4: You can look upon Windows being like Linux Distributions and OSX and constantly evolving, it is new to the Windows ecosystem and will take some getting used to, I am OK with it coming from a Linux/OSX background
I fully expect OS to have patches as required, for new features and bug fixes. I have been in this game for many years - think CP/M, Burroughs MCP, etc since the mid 80s. I think some of your comments in this thread are condescending. If some people feel things aren't quite right and you feel different doesn't make it right. Perhaps these people have different views.
What I think is "annoying" is having somethings moved around or redone in a way that either make things harder than before, or obscure then so much it's a pain to use. Small things such as two more clicks to connect to a VPN. Yes, sure, a batch file might work but why break what was working fine before? Or the links to KB articles from Windows Update. Small things that leave this bad taste.
A lot of what has been done feels like change for changes sakes. VERY few of the UI changes, have made me work faster and like MF, I have been around in IT a long time. There ARE good things in both W10 and W8/W8.1, it feels faster etc, but I have struck more "in my face" issues with W10 than I have ever done before, including RTM versions of W8, which was unfamiliar and somewhat confusing, but not as "buggy". As I have said before, it feels deadlines were prioritized over polish and finish. I also understand that given how widely deployed Windows is, there will inevitably be problems with some configurations, you can't get it 100% right, however stuff I am experiencing feel like it could have been nailed before release.
I'd love to know who/ how the decision to use white title-bars and make the ability to change it was taken away, was finalized. It's hard to believe a bunch of people were shown this and thought to themselves as a group "wow that looks so much better than before".