![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
bazzer: What happens in this situation:![]()
if there are cars coming from the right turning left into the street that the red car is in? Obviously, the green car has to give way to them so can the red car go? Or does it have to wait fo the (hypothetical) 10 left turning cars to go, so the green car can go, so the red car can go? Where is this covered in the rules?
BraaiGuy:bazzer: What happens in this situation:![]()
if there are cars coming from the right turning left into the street that the red car is in? Obviously, the green car has to give way to them so can the red car go? Or does it have to wait fo the (hypothetical) 10 left turning cars to go, so the green car can go, so the red car can go? Where is this covered in the rules?
If there was oncoming traffic, green car would have been stopped in front on red car.
In this picture, Green car has to only give way to all oncomming "blue" cars, if they turning or not.
Red Car also has to give way to oncomming "blue cars" and the green car.
I have always driven as to never trust an indicator and never to pull out unless you absolutely sure the car is turning. Red car is entering a new road, he must therefore give way to all cars on it.
So if there were turning blue cars, in order of right of way.
Blue cars, green car, and lastly red cars..
bazzer: What happens in this situation:![]()
if there are cars coming from the right turning left into the street that the red car is in? Obviously, the green car has to give way to them so can the red car go? Or does it have to wait fo the (hypothetical) 10 left turning cars to go, so the green car can go, so the red car can go? Where is this covered in the rules?
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
BraaiGuy:bazzer: What happens in this situation:![]()
if there are cars coming from the right turning left into the street that the red car is in? Obviously, the green car has to give way to them so can the red car go? Or does it have to wait fo the (hypothetical) 10 left turning cars to go, so the green car can go, so the red car can go? Where is this covered in the rules?
If there was oncoming traffic, green car would have been stopped in front on red car.
In this picture, Green car has to only give way to all oncomming "blue" cars, if they turning or not.
Red Car also has to give way to oncomming "blue cars" and the green car.
I have always driven as to never trust an indicator and never to pull out unless you absolutely sure the car is turning. Red car is entering a new road, he must therefore give way to all cars on it.
So if there were turning blue cars, in order of right of way.
Blue cars, green car, and lastly red cars..
trig42: That is what is good about the new rules.
If there was a car turning left into the bottom of the 'T' from the top of the 'T' then it would no longer have to worry about stopping to give way to the red car. The green car has to stop to give way to the red car, and must keep giving way till the red car has gone, which will be after the other car has turned left. It should work nice and smoothly.
trig42:BraaiGuy:bazzer: What happens in this situation:![]()
if there are cars coming from the right turning left into the street that the red car is in? Obviously, the green car has to give way to them so can the red car go? Or does it have to wait fo the (hypothetical) 10 left turning cars to go, so the green car can go, so the red car can go? Where is this covered in the rules?
If there was oncoming traffic, green car would have been stopped in front on red car.
In this picture, Green car has to only give way to all oncomming "blue" cars, if they turning or not.
Red Car also has to give way to oncomming "blue cars" and the green car.
I have always driven as to never trust an indicator and never to pull out unless you absolutely sure the car is turning. Red car is entering a new road, he must therefore give way to all cars on it.
So if there were turning blue cars, in order of right of way.
Blue cars, green car, and lastly red cars..
That is what is good about the new rules.
If there was a car turning left into the bottom of the 'T' from the top of the 'T' then it would no longer have to worry about stopping to give way to the red car. The green car has to stop to give way to the red car, and must keep giving way till the red car has gone, which will be after the other car has turned left. It should work nice and smoothly.
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
bazzer: I hadn't seen this situation addressed in any of the literature.
gzt: What if the green car wants to move halfway across the intersection at almost the same time directly behind the blue car? It can. It has the right of way over the red car the whole time. It is unsafe for the red car to move.
BraaiGuy:bazzer: I hadn't seen this situation addressed in any of the literature.Top of the T goes before me!
bazzer: The combination of the two new rules has created a new situation that hasn't existed before. I wouldn't expect the green car to enter the intersection so as to be positioned to immediately follow the "blue" car but I suppose that is what will happen.
Otherwise, I suppose it will be handled in the same way as pulling out of a road across a stationary lane of traffic (the intersection of course will be clear, as above), it's more a common sense/courtesy thing.
BraaiGuy:bazzer: The combination of the two new rules has created a new situation that hasn't existed before. I wouldn't expect the green car to enter the intersection so as to be positioned to immediately follow the "blue" car but I suppose that is what will happen.
Otherwise, I suppose it will be handled in the same way as pulling out of a road across a stationary lane of traffic (the intersection of course will be clear, as above), it's more a common sense/courtesy thing.
Remember this same rule is working everywhere else in the world. No new situations created here.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |