Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
  #611621 19-Apr-2012 06:31
Send private message

This seems to have been posted around Oct'09. Very interesting read... http://www.head-fi.org/t/451369/why-flac-is-better



Batman
Mad Scientist
29762 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #611624 19-Apr-2012 07:08
Send private message

*face palm

Handle9
11390 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #611627 19-Apr-2012 07:26
Send private message

You should tell him that he is correct and that the same algorithm is used for banking software so your balance is automatically reduced by 12% every year.



cyril7
9058 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #611631 19-Apr-2012 07:57
Send private message

Have any of you ever written signal processing code that includes voice coding, I have and its deployed in a number of telco based products used around the world, mainly military.

Coding for MP3 is partially asymetric, MP2 video is heavily assymetric, ie the coder does most of the work the decoder is less complex therefore some of the rules a coder may have done or not done in the early days may not apply in these mip rich days.

This is more apparent with MP2 video coding, ever wondered how over time sky keep putting more channels in to a spectrum but the pictures dont get dramatically worse and your decoder was never changed.

Even with audio it was common if you had meager resources to apply more pre filtering than might be desirable, there are probably 3 or 4 stages or sub routines where you can do more or less work but still get working outputs.

So yes a coder today probably provides a better quality for a certain bitrate than older coders but we are probably talking about some pretty old examples here.

As for any implication of the coder result spoiling with time, well that rubbish unless the file becomes corrupt.

Cyril

robjg63
4098 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #611633 19-Apr-2012 08:03
Send private message

I think this must be fundamentally incorrect. Here is my proof....

I have noticed in older (digital) photos I appear slimmer than in more recent photos.

Therefore I would say that the photos must be distorting over time and as they digitally age, the size of the subject is getting larger.




Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler


grant_k
3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #611638 19-Apr-2012 08:18
Send private message

cyril7: This is more apparent with MP2 video coding, ever wondered how over time sky keep putting more channels in to a spectrum but the pictures dont get dramatically worse and your decoder was never changed.

A TV industry insider tells me that they use a gadget called a "Stat Mux" to cram more channels in.  IIRC, this means Statistical Multiplexer, and relies on not all channels requiring the full bandwidth of a mux or satellite transponder at any given time.

However, in Sky's case, the compression on some channels like BBC World is so great, the picture increasingly looks like crap.  Recently I downloaded BBC Click via iPlayer and was amazed at how much better it looked.





kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #611655 19-Apr-2012 09:05
Send private message

Here is an article I found (wrote) just now that explains why MP3's degrade over time.

Its all to do with Osmosis, the 1's and 0's (ones and zeros) sit right next to each other in a file and over time due to digital osmosis small amounts of the 1 are absorbed by the 0 which lessens the value of the 1 slightly and increases the value of the 0. So after say 10 years the 1 can drop down to .9 while the 0 will rise to around .1 . Its 100% exactly the same as positive and negative charges attracting each other, but totally different and unrelated in any way.

So when playing an MP3 say 10 Years After (or any band for that matter) the 1's wont quite hit 1 anymore and the 0's will almost get down but wont quite boogie. This results in the quality sounding a little Muddy and Watery and lacking Clarity.

This doesn't happen with FLAC files though because although they are exactly the same as MP3 as far as using 1's and 0's they are completely different due to the buffer between the 1 and 0, a jacket if you will, that stops the Osmosis effect and also protects the file from being damaged by small arms fire.

The reason I know all this is that I have found a way to protect and even restore MP3 with a special piece of wire that when put next to any digital file will restore it back to its former glory. Tell your mate to keep an eye on Trade Me if he wants one.

 
 
 
 

Send money globally for less with Wise - one free transfer up to NZ$900 (affiliate link).

Bee

Bee
732 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #611658 19-Apr-2012 09:19
Send private message

I do have MP3's that have developed clicks in them...
Also JPG's that have funny colours thru them.

Im pretty sure however that this was all the result of me copying them off a HDD that had bad sectors and was dying... :)




Doing your best is much more important than being the best.


cyril7
9058 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #611668 19-Apr-2012 09:38
Send private message

A TV industry insider tells me that they use a gadget called a "Stat Mux" to cram more channels in. IIRC, this means Statistical Multiplexer, and relies on not all channels requiring the full bandwidth of a mux or satellite transponder at any given time.

However, in Sky's case, the compression on some channels like BBC World is so great, the picture increasingly looks like crap. Recently I downloaded BBC Click via iPlayer and was amazed at how much better it looked.


Morning Grant, yes I guess the last increase of capacity has come about by deploying stat muxs, a logical move. However the current Tandberg coders they use provided a 2.5-3x decrease in bitrate compared to the units they replaced, if anything when first deployed (and that drop in bitrate was felt) about 7-8yrs ago the images in anything improved over their old coders. Since then I think Tandberg have provided 2 or 3 software upgrades to reduce bitrates even futher, but as to if SkyNZ has taken/paid for those upgrades I have no idea. What is important, at no time did you decoder change. But agreed some of the current pics are awful, the FreeView TV1/2 off Sat which are also seen by Sky SD customers are shockers.

MP4 AVC is even more asymmetric, currently there are a number of clever coding techiniques that are not deployed due to the fact they need even more mips than economic and or only work with non realtime multipass, often these are used for BlueRay authoring but not feasible in live broadcast arena's.

Cheers
Cyril



cyril7
9058 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #611669 19-Apr-2012 09:39
Send private message

xpd youve screwed the page

Cyril

xpd

xpd
Geek @ Coastguard NZ
13765 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #611670 19-Apr-2012 09:42
Send private message

Whoops...attempting to fix :D




       Gavin / xpd / FastRaccoon / Geek of Coastguard New Zealand

 

                      LinkTree

 

 

 


lchiu7
6476 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #611671 19-Apr-2012 09:42
Send private message

Maybe the person who wrote the original article didn't realise that his hearing was degrading over time and attributed the SQ loss  to bit loss :-)




Staying in Wellington. Check out my AirBnB in the Wellington CBD.  https://www.airbnb.co.nz/h/wellycbd  PM me and mention GZ to get a 15% discount and no AirBnB charges.


xpd

xpd
Geek @ Coastguard NZ
13765 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #611672 19-Apr-2012 09:43
Send private message

Hid my post... Ill repost in a happier state later ;) (Rather than break GZ)




       Gavin / xpd / FastRaccoon / Geek of Coastguard New Zealand

 

                      LinkTree

 

 

 


stevenz
2802 posts

Uber Geek


  #612043 19-Apr-2012 17:52
Send private message

If the MP3s are stored on a CD they'll eventually degrade due to the organic materials the data is stored on decaying. On a hard-drive the magnetically stored data will _eventually_ lose its charge, but that could take decades on modern drives.





Regs
4066 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Snowflake

  #612109 19-Apr-2012 20:04
Send private message

LOL. I read that as "is it true that MPs lose their quality over time" and I wholeheartedly agreed.

when I realised we were actually talking about a digital music format, I then had to disagree.




1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.