Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1698323 4-Jan-2017 13:09
Send private message

Wainuiomata is not as bad as Flaxmere but did have staff there daily and eventually had to open an office to meet demand. Wainuiomata has improved especially with the efforts of notable sports people. It still has a lot of issues spanning generations.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.




blakamin
4431 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1306
Inactive user


  #1698325 4-Jan-2017 13:13
Send private message

You might as well add Stokes Valley, Naenae, and Taita to that list then.


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #1698519 4-Jan-2017 18:13
Send private message

Too hard to type on this thing but I know Flaxmere well from friends who were born there and have always lived there. lots of nice homes, good people, pleasant neighbourhoods. Every place has problems but Flaxmere definitely no nightmare.





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 




MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1698520 4-Jan-2017 18:16
Send private message

blakamin:

You might as well add Stokes Valley, Naenae, and Taita to that list then.



They were not the same as the examples I quoted. They do have issues but not at the levels that Flaxmere and Wainuiomata with Flaxmere bring the most worrisome.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1698565 4-Jan-2017 19:40
Send private message

I'm not familiar with any of those places - what's the issue with them?






gzt

gzt
18685 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7826

Lifetime subscriber

  #1698569 4-Jan-2017 19:51
Send private message

Fred99:

Deliberately agglomerating poor people isn't a good idea, even if that's what happens by default in a laissez-faire economy.


The proposed solutions miss the elephant in the room.


Prediction - it's probably gonna get worse.


Since the UK developments under discussion do not explicitly provide any housing for people that can be described as 'poor' by UK standards, this track of the discussion seems a bit irrelevant.

Similar to our Special Housing Area policy in NZ it appears the UK govt is expressing some kind of a preference for some 'affordable' housing to be part of those developments. People who can afford that provision are unlikely to be 'poor' by UK standards.

So by default, the poor are more likely to be found elsewhere.

That could be relevant after all.

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).

gzt

gzt
18685 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7826

Lifetime subscriber

  #1698571 4-Jan-2017 19:55
Send private message

That's not so say that other government agencies will not provide housing services in the developed area. Maybe they will. That will tend to balance it a bit, but nothing I've seen says that is an aim.

Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1698600 4-Jan-2017 21:06
Send private message

People who can afford nice houses do not generally want poor people as neighbours.

I recall a very expensive potential development which would have turned an old warehouse into apartments.

The local council insisted on the developer "pepperpotting" affordable housing apartments in the scheme.

The developer walked, because the council couldn't grasp that people who are willing and able to pay large amounts for posh flats would not accept the wrong social class as neighbours rendering the flats worth too little.





Linuxluver
5833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1639

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1698602 4-Jan-2017 21:18
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

New garden towns and villages to provide 200,000 homes to ease housing shortage

 

 

It's just more sprawl. Not a solution even in the short term.....never mind the long term. 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1698645 4-Jan-2017 23:38
Send private message

Linuxluver:

 

Geektastic:

 

New garden towns and villages to provide 200,000 homes to ease housing shortage

 

 

It's just more sprawl. Not a solution even in the short term.....never mind the long term. 

 

 

 

 

Unless you fancy Mega City One living, the only true solution is to control the human population but I can't see that happening in any meaningful sense.






Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1698725 5-Jan-2017 09:24
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

Linuxluver:

 

Geektastic:

 

New garden towns and villages to provide 200,000 homes to ease housing shortage

 

 

It's just more sprawl. Not a solution even in the short term.....never mind the long term. 

 

 

 

 

Unless you fancy Mega City One living, the only true solution is to control the human population but I can't see that happening in any meaningful sense.

 

 

 

 

Most (all?) wealthy nations have birth rates below population replacement.

 

The US and UK fertility rate (births / woman) are about 1.9 - the nations would have negative population growth if it wasn't for net migration gain.

 

So there is "control" on population through immigration.

 

 


 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).
Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1698754 5-Jan-2017 10:37
Send private message

I'm talking about the overall population. The sustainable number for that is 2 billion at a European standard of living - and it is 3 times that now.






SepticSceptic
2263 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 779

Trusted

  #1700506 9-Jan-2017 13:21
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

Linuxluver:

 

Geektastic:

 

New garden towns and villages to provide 200,000 homes to ease housing shortage

 

 

It's just more sprawl. Not a solution even in the short term.....never mind the long term. 

 

 

 

 

Unless you fancy Mega City One living, the only true solution is to control the human population but I can't see that happening in any meaningful sense.

 

 

Nothing that The Apocalypse War wouldn't fix ..

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Apocalypse_War

 

 

 

 


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #1700513 9-Jan-2017 13:42
Send private message

 Sooner or later, overpopulation has a way of correcting itself.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


shk292
2916 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2040

Lifetime subscriber

  #1700522 9-Jan-2017 14:50
Send private message

Fred99:

 

The US and UK fertility rate (births / woman) are about 1.9 - the nations would have negative population growth if it wasn't for net migration gain.

 

So there is "control" on population through immigration. 

 

 

Except, in the UK's case, there is no control because EU membership means the UK has no say over immigration.  Hence Brexit


1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.