Kyanar:nunz:Zeon: I hardly think this breaks the laws around spam as it isn't commercial - its a communication from the government....
It's probably not a good look with inviting links etc. but you are taking this complaint way overboard.....
minor point first then major point.
Point A
1 - It is commercial - TSB, Kiwibank, Insurance etc makes it commercial.
2 - It doesn't have to be commercial to be spam. Spam act states.
Section 6. A
Meaning of commercial electronic message
it could be excluded on the grounds of section 6B which states the email can be excluded as it ...
- For the purposes of this Act, commercial electronic message—
- (a) means an electronic message that—
- (i) markets or promotes—
- (A) goods; or
- (B) services; or
- (C) land; or
- (D) an interest in land; or
- (E) a business or investment opportunity; or
provides the recipient with information about goods or services offered or supplied by—
- (A) a government body; or
- (B) a court or tribunal; or
however this included information aobut goods nad services provided by TSB, Kiwibank, Post office, insurance etc - which makes it commerical again.
Point B
BUT PLEASE NOTE ---
the majority of my objection is not around the spam act, that was a minority point, it is around the issues of security and privacy that this email blew through.It is about not teaching people to follow third party links of dubious quality. it is not about unfettered sharing of details which is only legal if legislated explicitly between govt depts nad it is about giving our details to a third party, over seas, marketing company with a flawed history of security - including major breaches of private third party information.
If real.govt.nz wants to contact people and let them know, that's fine. get the relvant govt dept that I do have contact with to tell me. If they want to send direct, that is legal. dont use american marketing companies and dont promote comemrcial interests. TSB is blatantly promoted in this email, over and above even Kiwi bank which was / is a govt supported bank.
and again - do the damn thing right - not half baked redirects, third pary HTTPS certificates etc. for crying out loud, what type ofIAAS cant even identify itself?
Good lord you're taking this overboard. For a start, DIA does not charge anything for third parties to participate in the RealMe service. Second, the New Zealand Government does not even have a trusted root CA certificate in Windows (in fact, almost no governments do) - and frankly I'd prefer they don't, since if they did then it would be oh so ridiculously easy to MitM NZers personal communications (for children, or terrorists, or something) - so they have to purchase one from a third party, such as Verisign. Third, it's not a commercial email - it's an email telling you that iGovt is now Realme, and you can use it for stuff. OH NO THE WORLD IS ENDING.
I agree - SPF records match - its an authorised sender, for a government body. They even supplied an unsubscribe, which they didn't need to do. No real call to action, just informational - it has a link, but it's not asking for any credit card details. RealMe is all about a single login for government services. I don't see what the problem is. Just because they used a email provider doesn't mean they've compromised the data in any way. campaign monitor, constant contact etc are all overseas....