![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
tweake: that will be a major concern now. we had attacks on cell towers before, including toppling them over.
gzt: "Too many nuts were removed" how many is too many?
gzt:tweake: that will be a major concern now. we had attacks on cell towers before, including toppling them over.
seems unlikely that's going to happen also those people have trouble using a spanner imo. Weren't they trying to set fire to them or something?
while some where set on fire, we had some that where toppled over. they went quite a way to get to it to, so fairly determined.
According to the news detail I saw, more than one bolt at a time requires an engineering review, so only one bolt at a time should be removed from the pylon (not each leg)
Cyril
gzt:tweake: that will be a major concern now. we had attacks on cell towers before, including toppling them over.
seems unlikely that's going to happen also those people have trouble using a spanner imo. Weren't they trying to set fire to them or something?
Indeed. Few people have the gear to loosen nuts of the size likely used. One would need to find out the size and then source appropriate size gear (it's not cheap). I suggest for somebody bent on destruction, that faster, more destructive methods using non specialized hardware might be more appealing.
Might also suggest that there are few people crazy enough to attack the power grid:
Scott3:
gzt: "Too many nuts were removed" how many is too many?
There will be a procedure for work requiring nut removal, which will set out an engineered answer to this. (and likely a requirement to monitor winds so all nuts are installed for windstorms).
All we really need to know as the general public is that all them from 3/4 feet = too many removed.
Why were they simply not replaced with new ones one at a time and then torqued down properly...so this cost of this screw up vs the cost of new nuts...
sir1963:
Why were they simply not replaced with new ones one at a time and then torqued down properly...so this cost of this screw up vs the cost of new nuts...
i suspect its probably to many cooks in the kitchen with the emphasis on speed to get the job done fast at all costs. quite often its to many crew so things get done out sequence. the guys undoing the bolts faster than the other guys can do the work and get them back on.
tweake:
sir1963:
Why were they simply not replaced with new ones one at a time and then torqued down properly...so this cost of this screw up vs the cost of new nuts...
i suspect its probably to many cooks in the kitchen with the emphasis on speed to get the job done fast at all costs. quite often its to many crew so things get done out sequence. the guys undoing the bolts faster than the other guys can do the work and get them back on.
It takes just as long to remove a set of nuts as it does to put them on. Bet you they only had one tool... and we told to reuse the old nuts to "save money"
I do feel Stuff have missed a headline opportunity here. Something along then lines of" "Screw-loose Nuts Remove Too Many"
I'll see myself out...
sir1963:
It takes just as long to remove a set of nuts as it does to put them on. Bet you they only had one tool... and we told to reuse the old nuts to "save money"
the problem wasn't caused by faulty nuts, it was caused by taken them off all at once.
it looks like they undo one leg of the tower, inspect, clean and paint the base plate, and put nuts back on. except someone tried to do three legs at once.
more than likely it was like the crane collapse in canada where the guys where removing the crane, where meant to unbolt one section at a time, but someone went ahead and unbolted a whole lot of the sections. which made it fall down. trying to speed it up by doing some of the work early. most likely thats whats happened on the tower, while the other legs where being inspected, cleaned etc, someone went ahead and undone the other legs out of the normal sequence.
i get this all the time at work. people thinking they are helping make things go faster but all they do is cause problems.
tweake:
sir1963:
Why were they simply not replaced with new ones one at a time and then torqued down properly...so this cost of this screw up vs the cost of new nuts...
i suspect its probably to many cooks in the kitchen with the emphasis on speed to get the job done fast at all costs. quite often its to many crew so things get done out sequence. the guys undoing the bolts faster than the other guys can do the work and get them back on.
My armchair guess is that it was quicker/more efficient to work many bolts at at a time. I understand they were sandblasting the tower flanges and re-grouting between the flange and concrete foundation. Imagine undoing one nut, then sandblasting where it was, then applying protective coating, then retightening the nut, then starting all again for the next nut, and repeating that whole procedure a few dozen times on that one tower (I'm assuming there's a few bolts per tower leg). It would be a lot quicker to remove all nuts, sandblast the whole flange, coat the whole flange, and retighten the nuts. Even doing a whole flange at a time, you'd probably still have a few workers standing around at various points - so can certainly imagine the attraction to cut corners and save time/cost, unfortunately.
nickb800:
My armchair guess is that it was quicker/more efficient to work many bolts at at a time. I understand they were sandblasting the tower flanges and re-grouting between the flange and concrete foundation. Imagine undoing one nut, then sandblasting where it was, then applying protective coating, then retightening the nut, then starting all again for the next nut, and repeating that whole procedure a few dozen times on that one tower (I'm assuming there's a few bolts per tower leg). It would be a lot quicker to remove all nuts, sandblast the whole flange, coat the whole flange, and retighten the nuts. Even doing a whole flange at a time, you'd probably still have a few workers standing around at various points - so can certainly imagine the attraction to cut corners and save time/cost, unfortunately.
You do one leg at a time.
It's like rock climbing, you always keep 3 points of contact. This is NOT rocket science.
sir1963:
You do one leg at a time.
It's like rock climbing, you always keep 3 points of contact. This is NOT rocket science.
Apparently SOP is one nut at a time, so one leg would be extreme, but still safe..
Three out of four legs unbolted is just a huge invitation to whatever deity you believe in to "push that button"
nickb800:
you'd probably still have a few workers standing around at various points - so can certainly imagine the attraction to cut corners and save time/cost, unfortunately.
thats exactly what happens in this type of accident.
to much focus on speed, cut corners, or simply "looks like your doing something". i've struck it before with people who have been taught to "look busy", "find something to do", which also means they are not following instructions or procedures. very very hard to unteach that.
tweake: it looks like they undo one leg of the tower, inspect, clean and paint the base plate, and put nuts back on. except someone tried to do three legs at once.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |