kiwitrc:mattwnz:kiwitrc: Then maybe the solution is to tax companies more if they move to Auckland, or alternatively tax them less to set up in other centres.
This might help relieve the strain on the Auckland Housing Crisis (lets start calling it that) as well as the general Auckland infrastructure.
That would be a tax nightmare, and would be open to abuse. Eg. An auckland company may move their head office to dunedin for tax reasons, but it may just be a shell for offices in other areas.
IRD do audits now, they can easily audit a physical presence. It wouldn't be a nightmare at all. Simple matter of "you are based in Invercargill, you get a XX% rebate on your tax". I doubt any government would have the will to implement it to be honest as vested interest in Auckland would have it shot down in no time, but I haven't seen any other viable ideas so far so why not.
Just reminds me of these overseas companies trading in NZ, that have their head offices in foreign countries like Ireland where taxes are lower. Not sure the IRD have the resources either, there still seems to be quite a lot of tax leakage, especially around property.
There is actually a CGT already on property, if you intend to buy and sell for a profit. eg you buy a house to do up and then flick it off, but I suspect many people don't ever pay tax on it. I believe the IRD has had more money allocated to chase these up, but it would be a tough job to prove intention.