![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
sbiddle: Clothed DSL is the industry standard term for a MPF provisioned with xDSL+POTS.
#include <standard.disclaimer>
alexx:sbiddle: Clothed DSL is the industry standard term for a MPF provisioned with xDSL+POTS.
Which standardisation body made it an industry standard?
sbiddle:alexx:sbiddle: Clothed DSL is the industry standard term for a MPF provisioned with xDSL+POTS.
Which standardisation body made it an industry standard?
A name doesn'ty need to be set by a standards body to be used. You might have an issue with it, but they the accepted terms for the products by literally every person who works in the telco / ISP space in in NZ. It's also a term uses to describe DSL in many other countries (in the US however some do tend to refer to naked DSL as "dry DSL") . In all seriousness you're the first person I've come across who seem to have an issue with two terms that to me seem exceptionally logical, and with something that's in such common use in the industry I don't thing anything is going to be changing any time soon.
#include <standard.disclaimer>
alexx:sbiddle:alexx:sbiddle: Clothed DSL is the industry standard term for a MPF provisioned with xDSL+POTS.
Which standardisation body made it an industry standard?
A name doesn'ty need to be set by a standards body to be used. You might have an issue with it, but they the accepted terms for the products by literally every person who works in the telco / ISP space in in NZ. It's also a term uses to describe DSL in many other countries (in the US however some do tend to refer to naked DSL as "dry DSL") . In all seriousness you're the first person I've come across who seem to have an issue with two terms that to me seem exceptionally logical, and with something that's in such common use in the industry I don't thing anything is going to be changing any time soon.
So it's a colloquial term used on messageboards and informal discussions, but not an industry standard?
I was just asking, that's all.
#include <standard.disclaimer>
alexx: Thanks, but I checked google and wikipedia.
Naked DSL is widely used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_DSL
But not clothed DSL
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=clothed+dsl
I'm sure there are some people in the industry that might use the term, but it's seems to fall a long way short of an industry standard.
#include <standard.disclaimer>
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
chipc: List with corrected spelling and links. Anyone know of any less expensive naked DSL options in NZ?
Earthlight - earth -lite (1GB) - $34.45/mo (unsure if it is naked DSL)
InSPire - InSPire 2 GB Bitstream (2GB) - $35/mo (unsure if it is naked DSL)
Slingshot - Broadband 10 (10GB) - $40/mo
TelstraClear - Naked Broadband+ (20GB) - $55/mo (technically not naked DSL)
fyx - Pay as you go - $55.30/mo + $0.30/GB
Snap! - Naked Broadband 10 GB Basic (10GB) - $60/mo
Kiwilink - 2GB Plan (2GB) - $65/mo
WebWorld - Express 5GB (5GB) - $66.95/mo (unsure if it is naked DSL)
Vodafone - Ideal Naked (20GB, Outside Red Network) - $85/mo
Orcon - doesn't offer naked DSL
I can't decipher the WorldxChange website.
chipc: Slingshot - Broadband 10 (10GB) - $40/mo
appears to be naked DSL and less than $50 (it is actually $30/mo + $10 if you don't have a landline with them)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |