vexxxboy: would the public even care if UFB failed, the uptake has been way below what is possible and most people are happy with what they have, when the average usage has just gone from 20 GB a month to 40 Gb a month do people really need UFB as much as the government says they do.
That's the second part of the question. Today, we probably don't need UFB. We almost certainly will need a UFB, if not the UFB in the proposed form. But we don't know what we would use it for as yet. So, how to we convince people, including ourselves, that building it is probably a good idea now?
Much like when the Auckland harbour bridge was built it didn't need the clip on lanes and nobody probably even mentioned a rail line. With the wonders of hindsight we can imagine how much easier it would be to get around Auckland if these things had been considered before they were actually needed.
How can we use the lesson here make sure we don't make the same mistake with the UFB?