![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
PhantomNVD: Yes, but didn't they just lose a major sport event lineup to an online streaming co.?
If someone like with pockets as deep as telecom (Lightbox) starts gaining traction with VoD's, why wouldn't they want to pouch on Sky's sports scene too?
While it might take 10 years or so, I really think ALL pay to play when WE decide you can (esp in low 720p def like sky is now) is on it's way out. Look hard at the Netflix/Hulu/Amazon moves to capitalise on 'big pipe' fibre broadband capabilities, add in unlimited caps... Tell me again why SKY will still be here (unless it adapts pretty quickly!) in 10 years?
Common sense is not as common as you think.
hio77: Sky have quite a large amount of live sport followers currently... would be interesting to see lightbox successfully capitalize upon that!
SaltyNZ: It's too early to say Sky's days are numbered. But the cracks are starting to show. And no matter what the CEO says in the paper, he's scared alright. If he's not, then the shareholders should consider agitating for someone who IS.
Sky COULD turn it around. But not with their current attitude.
I was a Sky customer for 10 years before I cancelled it in favour of Netflix and Hulu. They didn't lift a *finger* to try to get me to stay when I called. The writing may not be on the wall yet, but they've chosen a colour and a nice new brush.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
DonGould:
You're in dream land if you think Sky's days are numbered.
I will very much agree that there might be a bit more value coming from Sky and we might see a price correction on some of their products but the suggestion they're over is just being silly.
Sky have an installed based of ~1.5m or more units.
JimmyH:
I'm pretty close to cancelling after a 17-18 year unbroken subscription. Now that we finally have affordable broadband plans for decent amounts of data, moving to streaming (Netflix, Hulu and the BBC) is starting to look like a no-brainer. I already have most of the infrastructure (network, media players etc) in place to do so, and it will all be in place by month end.
What they would have to offer me is not so much a price correction (although an extra $10 a month for an "HD Ticket" is pretty obnoxious) but a product correction. About the only channel I watch a lot of entertainment on is SoHo - not just because it has decent content but also because it's ad free.
Many of the other Sky channels such as Jones and the Box, which I might want to watch for nostalgia reasons, are essentially unwatchable because of the ceaseless interruptions to bombard the viewer with ads and promos. If they want to keep me, dialling back the ads and promos so they only run between shows rather than every 5-7 minutes during them would be a good start.
SaltyNZ: No-one's going to do unlimited wireless data, not even on 4G, if that's what you're getting at. It would be suicide. :)
DonGould:
Get back to me when Chorus have a layer 2 product in the market with IGMP snooping as part of the interface like NBN Co have with the Australian NBN so that a provider like Spark can deliver live streams via unicast.
In the mean time Lightbox is a VoD product from what I can tell.
DonGould:hio77: Sky have quite a large amount of live sport followers currently... would be interesting to see lightbox successfully capitalize upon that!
Get back to me when Chorus have a layer 2 product in the market with IGMP snooping as part of the interface like NBN Co have with the Australian NBN so that a provider like Spark can deliver live streams via unicast.
In the mean time Lightbox is a VoD product from what I can tell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IGMP_snooping
DjG: So id like to know what people think on this.
I run a few networks around the place and I'm seeing this more and more.
Users are not downloading (i.e. saving to disk) much these days, torrents are representing SFA of the total traffic, the majority of the traffic down is streamed from the likes of youtube, netflix, hulu etc. The problem i see with this is that the average usage per user of international bandwidth is now 1.8+ Mbit. now I'm considering that my household uses a fair bit of netflix and hulu we stream it at approx 4 - 6Mbit, now if we have 1K users streaming at any one time and thats not that many users and all streaming at one particular time thats 4 - 6Gig of international transit.
From where I sit its just not feasible to be running links that hot for the amount of users, the financials just dont add up unless your doing something dodgy or on the cheep.
so back to my question....
what are the GZ users now doing, are you streaming from the US or are "linux torrents" the way for the majority ?
Ragnor: Yeah he must have meant ip multicast also Australian NBN is dead in the water with the new government, Telstra's lobbying dollars at work.
I'd rather they focused on bigger/faster pipes/switching and not get to fancy. Let the ISP's and other Service Providers worry about what to put on top.
Ragnor: Why? Most content is consumed on demand (tv, movies, news) or trending towards higher on demand consumption. Live sport is the exception not the norm.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |