![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
ChillingSilence: Just got a txt, Jan 4th now?!
ChillingSilence: Unfortunately I've never heard of a line tap before
KiwiNick: Rolling back to the issue of a Line Tap ...
ChillingSilence: Unfortunately I've never heard of a line tap before
Also known as: a multiple. It's where one pair appears at more than one place. This can be with cabinets or CTs (on power poles). It was quite common in the 60's, but only in New Zealand if I'm not mistaken. Basically it's a Tee junction in the cable, which has no effect on voice frequencies, but at ADSL frequencies, it's diabolical.
I must admit though, I've never heard of one pair appearing at multiple cabinets (as seem to be alluded to by DonGould's first diagram). But his second diagram is much more of a possibility, for suburbs done in the 80's.
I'm not too sure what Telecom did past 1990, but they did try direct-buried joints in one or two locations, which seemed to work much better than the RLG (the grey pillar things sticking out of the ground).
ChillingSilence: Thanks Shaun! I'll make sure I'm home all day then.
Any word on the other two matters raised, the cable map and the line cards in use in all the cabinets?
ChillingSilence: there was a mix-up with the pairs, one was using one cable from one pair and one cable from another.
ChillingSilence: Anyways so at the end of the driveway the two lines are syncing at 12mbps and 13mbps respectively. Follow the cable 25 meters to my place and they're now syncing at 10191kbps and 9271kbps. Both under the 10mbps, and losing 4mbps over the space of 25 meters to the demarc point under my house. The speed loss from the demarc to the patch-panel and routers (Which is 100% CAT6 from the demarc) is negligible, less than 10K and not worth worrying about (As it should be).
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |