OK, please forgive me if this is the stupidest question ever posed on Geekzone but here goes. 

The UFB project aims at 100 mbit/s speed and requires the digging up of most of the country to lay cables which is very difficult because of the geology and geography. 

An LTE (often called 4G) network aims to deliver 100 mbit/s speed down and 50 mbit/s up and requires the building of towers which sit above the ground. 

Both networks probably deliver the 100 mbit/s when you switch them on due to the number of people on the network and a lot of other reasons. 

So, why are we, as in the government funded by tax payers, building a UFB network and not an LTE network? Or a bit of both?