![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
hio77:
Its literally just cascading interfaces.
As in:
Interfaces > Vlan > Add new
Vlan100 / ID 100 / Interface: ethX
and
Interfaces > Vlan > Add new
Vlan10 / ID 10 / Interface: Vlan100
To have an outer ID of 100 and a Vlan of 10?
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
I have tried cascading interfaces, for example, vlan10 inside vlan11, however it isn't quite working. I'm thinking the issue may be related to 'breaking' out vlan10 at the switch end. I need to have this vlan10 at port SFP1 and tag packets from this port as vlan10.
Do you have any further pointers to offer please?
Present setup:
Router with PPPoE client on vlan10.
Vlan10 through bonding trunk interface to switch.
Bridge1 includes Vlan10 and other Vlans.
SFP port is member of Vlan10 with tagging under bridge/vlan settings and and PVID set as 10 under port settings.
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
Well this is far from ideal
https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=147076
darylblake:
Well this is far from ideal
https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=147076
Ouch. Thanks for posting.
I do have IPV6.
My router rebooted for no reason a few days ago. I wonder if it's related to this.
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
Anything I say is the ramblings of an ill informed, opinionated so-and-so, and not representative of any of my past, present or future employers, and is also probably best disregarded.
Considering how broken IPv6 is in RouterOS I'm really surprised anybody has it working.
sbiddle:Considering how broken IPv6 is in RouterOS I'm really surprised anybody has it working.
Anything I say is the ramblings of an ill informed, opinionated so-and-so, and not representative of any of my past, present or future employers, and is also probably best disregarded.
toejam316:
I've been surprised at the amount of WISPs overseas who have things like dominant v6 networks with tik routers - seems that most people in the wisp business are mad
I say this in the nicest way - one has be a little bit mad to be in the WISP business ;-)
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
I would just get two Draytek DV130 modems and bridge the IP to each interface of the router. This would take out all the fun with VLAN clashes, or just do one interface like this.
You can get them quite cheap as people are moving to fibre, and they are also reasonably priced as new.
Just a thought would double tagging the data be the best way to achieve it?
Have WAN1 on VLAN 20, then setup a PPPoE / DHCP on VLAN20.10
Have WAN2 on VLAN 30, then setup a PPPoE / DHCP on VLAN30.10
Not sure how you do this specifically on the Mikrotiks but I know that's how I have done it on Cisco and Lucent gear in the past.
In Tik you can create a vlan with a master interface of any other interface (Including another vlan for Q-in-Q).
I call the interfaces "X.Y - Interface Purpose - X.Y" where - X = Interface Number and Y = VLAN Number
Hmmmm
engedib:
I would just get two Draytek DV130 modems and bridge the IP to each interface of the router. This would take out all the fun with VLAN clashes, or just do one interface like this.
You can get them quite cheap as people are moving to fibre, and they are also reasonably priced as new.
I think I will do this. The 5311 SFP is an elegent option for 1 VDSL connection but for 2 or more it is very annoying.
To confirm - I run them as bridges and can still use the PPPoE client on the Mikrotik?
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
MichaelNZ:
engedib:
I would just get two Draytek DV130 modems and bridge the IP to each interface of the router. This would take out all the fun with VLAN clashes, or just do one interface like this.
You can get them quite cheap as people are moving to fibre, and they are also reasonably priced as new.
I think I will do this. The 5311 SFP is an elegent option for 1 VDSL connection but for 2 or more it is very annoying.
To confirm - I run them as bridges and can still use the PPPoE client on the Mikrotik?
You won't need the PPPoE client on the Mikrotik.
Some additional detail is here: https://www.draytek.com/support/knowledge-base/5367
engedib:
You won't need the PPPoE client on the Mikrotik.
Some additional detail is here: https://www.draytek.com/support/knowledge-base/5367
Thanks for that link.
Put another way, can I choose to keep how I currently have it, running PPPoE on the Mikrotik and just use the Draytek DV130 as a pure bridge?
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |