If you sign an hourly rate contract for a set duration, say it's for 6 months, and you're told within a few days of starting that the actually duration is now much less, say 3, can an employer do that? This isn't a fixed term engagement.
![]() ![]() |
What does the contract say? Contracts can be verbal, but it's much easier to have things in writing.
It's all written and signed. Start date / end date.
The contract is the contract.
There may be clauses in there that allow them (or you) to vary the terms, so you'd want to check for that.
As always though, it's only as good as your ability to enforce it. If they end up being a pain about it, you may be able to negotiate a partial payout for the remaining time, rather than involving lawyers. Depends on how keen you are and what sort of relationship you want with the other party going forward.
IANAL.... but my 2c based on my commercial experience.
It's a fixed term engagement and both parties are expected to adhere to it. Are there any early termination clauses that you might have missed?
You might have had two offers on the table.... one for 3 months and one for 6 months, so naturally you are more likely to take the longer engagement. Being told 6 months is now three potentially hurts you financially, and drops you in the job market over a holiday period where it may be hard to find work.
Options include....:
What would his commercial landlord do if he tried to exit 18 months into a 3 year lease? The commercial landlord would either flatly decline or may say 'you can pay the rent until a replacement tenant is found, and advertising the tenancy etc is at your expense'.
If this is an employment contract, have a look here: https://www.employment.govt.nz/resolving-problems/
If this is a commercial contract for services, you could consider going to the Disputes Tribunal for their ruling. Most likely this would happen after you finish and the relationship has taken a turn for the worst and you feel you have little to lose. $15k maximum. https://disputestribunal.govt.nz/ In my experience, the tribunal often just splits the difference, so go in with your highest number under $15k and if you have stated your case well, be optimistic about getting 50%. Don't be too surprised if you get a settlement offer from the other party a few days before the hearing. If that offer is 50%, take it as a win and run.
“Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.” Douglas Adams
Referral links to services I use, really like, and may be rewarded if you sign up:
PocketSmith for budgeting and personal finance management. A great Kiwi company.
Dynamic:
If this is a commercial contract for services, you could consider going to the Disputes Tribunal for their ruling. Most likely this would happen after you finish and the relationship has taken a turn for the worst and you feel you have little to lose. $15k maximum. https://disputestribunal.govt.nz/ In my experience, the tribunal often just splits the difference, so go in with your highest number under $15k and if you have stated your case well, be optimistic about getting 50%. Don't be too surprised if you get a settlement offer from the other party a few days before the hearing. If that offer is 50%, take it as a win and run.
This was increased recently (in the last year or so) and it's $30k maximum now.
Two things. Talk to them about why they are changing the contract term and why they think they can do this. Don't give them any feedback other than noting what they say and make it clear that you will be taking professional advice and will then give them feedback. After the meeting send them an email with your minutes from the meeting so you have a clear paper trail. Anything they have only said verbally put in writing. Don't be a dick about it but do not give them the impression that you are ok with what is happening.
Go and talk to a lawyer. It will cost you some money but it'll give you your boundary conditions and likely outcomes. You can negotiate from there.
Best of luck!
Check the contract wording but from experience as an IT contractor, companies will often include clauses along the lines of either party can terminate the contract early with 2 weeks notice etc. So them reducing this to 3 months is likely them "giving notice" of early termination.
<#
.DISCLAIMER
Anything I post is my own and not the views of my past/present/future employer.
#>
Thanks for the input.
Yeah there is a statement that they can terminate for whatever reason with 2 weeks notice. Seems like an a**hole thing to do and somewhat negates the whole purpose of having a duration. I negotiated my rate based on the longer duration.
I guess you chalk it up to a learning experience? Hope you didn't take too much of a rate cut.
Wonder if next time you can insert a clause such that if they invoke the right to terminate your contract early, there is a penalty to do so to prevent this sort of thing happening again.
That's why I'm reluctant to sign contracts over 6months as it mainly benefits the employer by fixing your rate. 3,6 or 12 months, both parties can always terminate the contract at short notice.
& please let us know the outcome & what you've learned?
Please keep this GZ community vibrant by contributing in a constructive & respectful manner.
![]() ![]() |