![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Satire: Absolutely unacceptable. You managed to read half a two line advertisement, change the meaning so it suited you then claim the FAQ (Which I recall reading a good year and a bit ago, and it contained the right info then) changes 'weekly' so how could you have known about the different steam servers that your computer would use automagically??!?
THEN you tried to act all high and mighty, invoking the name of the all powerful commerce commission in the hope of forcing these evil Orcon guys to do the unpossible and make all the internets free for you. (OK, maybe just put in a bunch of stupidly expensive DPI boxes or something at a few hundy thousands cost and zero rate it for no perceivable business case just because you are unable to Internet)
Yep, that was highly unacceptable, and now you are wondering why the easier option for them is to simply turn off a free service they were giving you ?
1080p: Well, not much left to be said here. Some whiny Orcon staff apparently don't like taking constructive criticism on an issue that should obviously already be an identified problem (read: Commerce Commission interest) and instead spit the dummy and attack their customers :|
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nebukadnessar
NonprayingMantis: Personal opinion, and I am not a lawyer, I would say that you have 3 options:
a) Remove the unmetering capability it altogether (which would be a shame)
b) Unmeter ALL steam content even if not served from your server (presumably very expensive, not even sure if it would be possible)
c) Just be really clear right upfront on ALL your communications and adverts (not just within the FAQs) about Steam that there is a strong possibility that the content downloaded will NOT be unmetered and that neither you nor the customer can control it. Don?t ask people to look at FAQs, small print, or notes for details since this is a fundamental limitation of the offer. Instead, state it right upfront in the same place you talk about unmetering. It makes the ?message? weaker, but it also makes it accurate.
The banner said nothing about any FAQs at all, and other places simply ask you to read an FAQ but don?t state the issue upfront
This page doesn?t mention the risk upfront http://games.orcon.net.nz/index.php?page=steam it just says to read an FAQ.
This page doesn?t mention the risk upfront http://www.orcon.net.nz/support/gfaq_page/which_sites_are_included_in_the_o_zone/ it just says to please read a note.
detonate: Preeeeeeeeettttttty sure I didn't attack anyone, nor did I say I represented Orcon.
I just said that the likely outcome is that it'll get turned off.
I do admit that I was wrong though, TCL's Steam server is open to the internets as well.
Kyanar:
Point 1: At no point did I mention the commerce commission. Someone else did, but I can't see how that would be necessary - it's an easy fix. One which, might I add, they actually went ahead and fixed.
Point 2: At no point did I say they need to make the internet free. That's not even slightly rational - maybe one day that will be possible but right now that would be commercial suicide.
Point 3: The easier option isn't to turn it off, it's to clarify the two line advertisement so that people don't think there's a guarantee they won't be charged - which they did.
Point 4: I don't need to change the meaning of "zero rated for Orcon customers". It already says all it needs to. The FAQ is irrelevant, because nothing tells you that you need to read it, Also, hyperbole. Look it up.
Satire:NonprayingMantis: Personal opinion, and I am not a lawyer, I would say that you have 3 options:
a) Remove the unmetering capability it altogether (which would be a shame)
b) Unmeter ALL steam content even if not served from your server (presumably very expensive, not even sure if it would be possible)
c) Just be really clear right upfront on ALL your communications and adverts (not just within the FAQs) about Steam that there is a strong possibility that the content downloaded will NOT be unmetered and that neither you nor the customer can control it. Don?t ask people to look at FAQs, small print, or notes for details since this is a fundamental limitation of the offer. Instead, state it right upfront in the same place you talk about unmetering. It makes the ?message? weaker, but it also makes it accurate.
The banner said nothing about any FAQs at all, and other places simply ask you to read an FAQ but don?t state the issue upfront
This page doesn?t mention the risk upfront http://games.orcon.net.nz/index.php?page=steam it just says to read an FAQ.
This page doesn?t mention the risk upfront http://www.orcon.net.nz/support/gfaq_page/which_sites_are_included_in_the_o_zone/ it just says to please read a note.
The banner said
"downloads.orcon.net.nz zero rated for Orcon customers"
Now this is crazy
And I just met you
But if I browse to http://games.orcon.net.nz/index.php?page=files
Could it be free for Orcon users maybe ?
I guess kids these days inability to actually parse English may have something to do with it, or short attention spans that only read half sentences, but seriously.. ? I really don't see the ambiguity.
As for being upfront, what part of "Please read the FAQ" is hard to understand, especially when the line before this talks about the free usage. "Free usage, please read the Frequently asked Questions for more information !"
detonate:
I still think the original banner was fine.
The website, games.orcon.net.nz (in fact EVERYTHING inside the subnet that the Games Zones sits on, is zero rated)
The banner did not say "ALL STEAM TRAFFIC IS FREE". Nor did Orcon state as much.
But, it's been updated anyway, so yay.
NonprayingMantis:
Now this is crazy
And I just met you
But if I see a banner that says the content was hosted by orcon and free to orcon customers
then woulnd;t it be reasonable to expect that to be true maybe
actually it said:
![]()
"content hosting provided by downloads.orcon.net.nz zero rated for Orcon customers"
conent hosted by company x and zero rated for orcon customers means to any reasonable person, that the content they are currently downloading is zero rated for orcon customers, which wasn't true.
the banner could have said:
usually zero rated for orcon customer please read FAQ for more details
sometimes zero rated for orcon customer please read FAQ for more details
mostly zero rated for orcon customer please read FAQ for more details
it didn't.
Now this is crazy
And I just met you
But if I see a banner that says the content was hosted by orcon and free to orcon customers
then woulnd;t it be reasonable to expect that to be true maybe
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |