![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Sales Engineer
Snowflake
www.snowflake.com
about.me/nzregs
Twitter: @nzregs
grant_k:
Any attempt to cross-subsidise rural cabinets at the expense of urban cabinets is bound to fail.
The farmers are a powerful lobby group and provide a large proportion of New Zealand Inc's income via export sales don't under estimate them.
Regs: i dont know why anyone (telecom, orcon, vodafone, telstraclear) would bother spending any money on infrastructure - such as cabinetisation and adsl2 - when its all supposedly to be replaced by FTTH.
Sounddude:
Cabinet unbundling is a quick fix, which could be rolled out within months/years. FTTH is 5+ years away.
However its hard for the smaller guys compete. Lets say 200-300 users total is a cabinet. a 5% market share would mean an average of 15 customers per cabinet. If the Access seeker is paying $630 for the space, $700 for the backhaul per month AND paying for the equipment. Its not a viable buiness model.
Sales Engineer
Snowflake
www.snowflake.com
about.me/nzregs
Twitter: @nzregs
Regs:
As far as the costing goes - I dont have a problem with access being granted at a fair/reasonable price but I cant see why telecom should be made to provide access at a loss. If they did so then they would find themselves in the position you describe above - with costs outweighing the revenues. Why should they do that? They are not a govt owned entity anymore - they are a business with shareholders.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |