Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
groynk
234 posts

Master Geek


  #653992 11-Jul-2012 13:40
Send private message

I can. Very magic eye indeed.

I can't get the large version to cross though (get about half way), the smaller ones are sweet.

I do it by looking (focussing) through the screen, but neither version seems reversed? Unless its just too small to pick up.

Cool work



bazzer
3438 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #653996 11-Jul-2012 13:51
Send private message

I could see it in the cross-eyed version but I couldn't get my eyes to diverge enough for your parallel version. On my monitor the images are 80mm apart which is larger than my interpupillary distance and I certainly can't turn my eyeballs outwards. Can some people, can I?!

Interesting that to me it didn't look like "real" 3D, the people in the foreground appeared as a 2D layer in front of the background. Still pretty cool.

robjg63
4099 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #653998 11-Jul-2012 14:01
Send private message

Yep - the crossed one was fine - The parallel one defintely has some sort of depth - but in a screwed up sort of way.




Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler




Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #654063 11-Jul-2012 16:17
Send private message

bazzer: I could see it in the cross-eyed version but I couldn't get my eyes to diverge enough for your parallel version. On my monitor the images are 80mm apart which is larger than my interpupillary distance and I certainly can't turn my eyeballs outwards. Can some people, can I?!

Interesting that to me it didn't look like "real" 3D, the people in the foreground appeared as a 2D layer in front of the background. Still pretty cool.


The LG 3D Max is has an inter-axial distance of about 25mm. So yes.....depth fades rapidly beyond about 5 metres. 

My Fuji Real 3D W3 has an inter-axial distance of 75mm - same as human eyes - so depth is perceived at distances very similar to what our eyes would see. 

But the Fuji is crap for close-ups....because the lenses on a camera can't converge on a close object the way our eyes can. I use the LG 3D Max mainly for things that are close (0.4m to 4m).....and then the depth works quite well. 




_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.