![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi Team, we are watching this thread but don't really have any conclusive information to share as of yet.
That being said, some upcoming maintenance is being planned which may assist with those who are experiencing these issues (potentially) and will post here once that's booked.
Quic Broadband
quic.nz - The telco who puts you in charge!
Rate limiting to 100Mbps upload has made no real improvement in my case - also in Wellington.
I am currently testing and monitoring it running on VLAN10 with DHCP - accumulating more results over time.
Initial results are very much the same as Untagged DHCP/PPPoE.
quic:
Hi Team, we are watching this thread but don't really have any conclusive information to share as of yet.
That being said, some upcoming maintenance is being planned which may assist with those who are experiencing these issues (potentially) and will post here once that's booked.
Excited fingers crossed!
Hi,
Can I get some advice please.
I tried the suggestion to rate limit uploads to 100Mbps - no improvement.
I tried hard-coding the destination speedtest server to be Vetta Auckland (34112) - seems worse for me, here in Wellington. I have reverted back to the Vetta Christchurch server (42535) for scheduled speedtests - let's see what that does...
Is there a server that has a more optimal connection that I should be using?
The last result when speedtest looks for the 11 'closest' returns this order:
ID Name Location Country==============================================================================
42535 Vetta Online Christchurch New Zealand
4954 One New Zealand Wellington New Zealand
11326 Spark New Zealand Wellington New Zealand
46550 NOW Wellington New Zealand
41578 Zylex Wellington New Zealand
43554 ACSData Wellington New Zealand
61718 Voyager Internet Wellington New Zealand
3797 Inspire Net Ltd Palmerston North New Zealand
2336 Amuri.net Culverden New Zealand
2025 Primo New Plymouth New Zealand
465 NOW Napier New Zealand
Thanks in advance for any advice.
I find that Chorus Fibre Lab Auckland good for testing server id 28463
Thought I might post an update, there was a marginal improvement over the last 12ish days, but then sometime over the last day or 2 something has changed to have fixed all my issues.
Not sure who it was but thank you internet Jesus! - as they say time heals all wounds.
One thing I did do, though not sure if it is related, was updated my IP in all the GeoIP databases I could find (such as Maxmind) to reference my actual city.
Pings are back down to 2ms, uploads are stable at 500+ and downloads stable at 925+/-
HoochWindgrass: One thing I did do, though not sure if it is related, was updated my IP in all the GeoIP databases I could find (such as Maxmind) to reference my actual city.
Take a look at https://geolocatemuch.com as Quic/Vetta publish geofeeds. Shouldn't impact your connection though, that's just a weird issue.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
Likewise, I am now seeing a consistent throughput on the connection!
Latency is far more stable as well:
My Windows Server still has upstream throughput issue - none of my other machines do.
So need to investigate that side.
@RedeviL: My Windows Server still has upstream throughput issue - none of my other machines do.
So need to investigate that side.
Take a look at this thread: https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=194&topicid=312784
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
michaelmurfy:
Take a look at this thread: https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=194&topicid=312784
Thanks for that, I had tuned it as well as Windows will allow.
And it is running a Mellanox adapter so luckily doesn't suffer the same issues as some Realtek chipsets.
I wonder if a Windows update reset the tuning.
Or it's possible dust got in when I had pulled the SFPs and fibre cables to originally troubleshoot.
RedeviL:
michaelmurfy:
Take a look at this thread: https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=194&topicid=312784
Thanks for that, I had tuned it as well as Windows will allow.
And it is running a Mellanox adapter so luckily doesn't suffer the same issues as some Realtek chipsets.
I wonder if a Windows update reset the tuning.
Or it's possible dust got in when I had pulled the SFPs and fibre cables to originally troubleshoot.
I updated my post there (again). Thought i had fixed it, but still looking for the little network gremlins running around somewhere. Very odd issue
cjkbarnett:
I updated my post there (again). Thought i had fixed it, but still looking for the little network gremlins running around somewhere. Very odd issue
But I think it is failing to manage / handle what might be buffers within Quic.
Windows 10 is the most effected.
Windows 11 is effected - but less than 10.
Linux by default is not.
I am spinning up a fresh Win10, Win11 and Linux VM to investigate further.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |