![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Specs look really good, I like the fact it supports WPA3 - This should become the standard now (just more clients need to support it)
the 2.5GE WAN port is nice, however I would like to see at least one of the LAN ports support this too
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
alisam:
jdogz:
SM3 (Wi-Fi 6) - 4
SM3+Mesh2-wired backhaul (Wi-Fi 6) - 4.5
If you need to expand your Wi-Fi coverage of the SM1/SM2 - mesh units work well - a lot better via wired backhaul
How many Mesh2 Units are you using?
What area are you covering with Modem and Mesh Units.
1, 2 or more storey house.
I did try and find out what the 2 ethernet ports were for and came to the conclusion they were for backhaul. But until this last week or so, I had never heard of backhaul.
Based on my house layout, I will not be able to backhaul (the Home CEO will veto any suggestion).
Got a 1 story place and just 1 mesh2 unit with SM3. Once mesh2 is setup correctly the second LAN port can be used to provide internet to another device say TV etc.
(Fortunate to have network ports in most rooms so put units in best place to maximise WiFi coverage where needed)
Can anyone explain the differences in bandwidth of the Smart Modem 2 vs 3? I'm trying to pick up one of them second hand to use in conjunction with a Smart Mesh 2 (as a way of getting cheap but good 4x4 Wifi 6 up!)
In particular:
- SM2 states 1147Mbps+2400Mbps
- SM3 states 860.3Mbps+4803.9Mbps
- I assume the first number is 2.4Ghz and the second number is 5Ghz
- So why is the SM2 (theoretically) a higher PHYS speed over 2.4Ghz? They're both 4x4? Is there an actual difference in modulation/coding?
- And why is the SM3 (theoretically) a higher PHYS speed over 5GHz? It is basically double the SM2, which makes me suspect it is dual-band 5GHz, i.e. has three antenna in total (including the 2.4Ghz one). Is this correct? If so, any meaningful difference?
P.S. Happy to pay full price for an SM3 if anyone can source one for me...
concordnz:
And iirc some ipv6 or port management limitations.
Curious as what you mean regarding IPv6 limitations. Spark does not support IPv6 so it is pretty much moot whether the CPE supports it or not.
KiwiSurfer:
concordnz:
And iirc some ipv6 or port management limitations.
Curious as what you mean regarding IPv6 limitations. Spark does not support IPv6 so it is pretty much moot whether the CPE supports it or not.
The Smartmodem, SM2 and SM3 all support ipV6.
Not sure whether there are any important limitations in the v6 support...
Cheers - N
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
I am getting upgraded to a Smart Modem 3 via Skinny, I was wondering if it is possible to use the old Smart Modem 1 as a mesh unit? Or do I need to try and source a Smart Mesh 2 unit from somewhere?
Yes they can, see below.
Cheers.
https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=39&topicid=302870
Jawa:Yes they can, see below.
Cheers.
https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=39&topicid=302870
Yeah I wonder if you can do it with the SM3 as the base. Does the mesh one have to have wired backhaul? Or can it do wireless mesh? (I know wired is much better)
I have received the following from our devices team in regards to meshing SM1 and SM3:
SM1 uses a different mesh client when compared to SM3/SM2/SM5G which all use the same client.
The result is they will not connect like true mesh products. There will be likely scenarios where each would probably attempt to control. Spark does not advise using the products this way. User beware etc.
You could connect one to the other via a LAN connection but you should be disable the secondary device's DHCP.
My views are my own, and may not necessarily represent those of my employer.
For anyone now using the V3, any similar issues noted so far?
The self-resetting of the modem is rare enough that I've tolerated it so far, but it's still typically around once or twice a day. And every so often it really picks a poor moment to do it. So I really *should* get it replaced. V3 might be the go if people are finding it reliable so far. :)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |