![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Madmax77: Post below found on Macrumors. Seems the US iPhone 3G is being subsidised US$200 by AT&T who will make the $200 back over the term of the 2 year contract. So if the true cost of the device is a US$400, then we may expect to pay a little more here (ie, NZ$599 perhaps?) depending on how much Vodafone is subsidising it here. Not sure who controls the price in that arena...but we are in for an interesting ride.AT&T iPhone 3G Upgrades and Eligibility
Copyright (c) 2000-2006 MacRumors.com, LLC
It seems there's a lot of confusion about iPhone 3G upgrades and activation. Here's what is known at the moment to try to clarify the confusion. All of this applies to the U.S. and AT&T only. (more)
Damager:then when telecom's new gsm network is running <snip>
does this sound feasible or am i way off trackyes, I did cut some words, and no not off track,Not a question of IF but a question of WHEN
I have seen a number of posts talking about how Vodafone is likely to charge much more then US$200. If we do see them release the phone at the NZ$600-1000 while it is being released in other markets at US$200 then Vodafone must surely have a case to answer to the commerce commission about abusing monopoly power (only provider) and price gorging. This also applies to the data plans on offer. If prices are so high that it is obvious they are abusing their position as the only provider to maximise profit.
I would encourage all those reading to consider a "fair" price and an unacceptability price. Should this unacceptable price be breached, by contacting the Ombudsman we could force a review of their pricing policy. By proving that prices are substantially cheaper in markets where there is competition (two or more carriers who have the iphone) then Vodafone would have a case to answer of exploiting their monopoly position and price gorging.
The Commerce Act outlines ways that Vodafone can be judged and held accountable should it be necessary.
dominicmck:.... Vodafone must surely have a case to answer to the commerce commission about abusing monopoly power (only provider) and price gorging.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster:dominicmck:.... Vodafone must surely have a case to answer to the commerce commission about abusing monopoly power (only provider) and price gorging.
Vodafone NZ (not sure about other vodafone groups) are not a monopoly. If you don't like the price, perhaps another phone would be more suitable?
As the only provider of the iphone they will have a monopoly on the iphone (not on mobiles in general). While we all have a choice to choose a different phone if we do not like the prices, it does not mean that the prices or policies are legal under NZ competition law.
When it is possible to directly compare to a similar market (Australia) with multiple competing providers and the NZ monopoly price is higher, than the law has provisions to review the pricing structure. Despite the fact that monopoly pricing occurs in NZ often without being challenged, the popularity of the iphone and potential scale of the price gorging could warrant sufficient public outcry, which directed through the right channels could have an impact.
amanzi: I have this crazy feeling that not only are Vodafone going to release the iPhones at great pricing ($299 for 8GB version) but they will also unveil a new data plan that will blow away all their current plans. Call me hopeful but I get the impression that VFNZ are finally starting to listen to their customers... First there was the locking/unlocking of phones saga, then they released the $1 a day casual rate, next will be a big improvement to their data plans...
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |