![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
KiwisOnLand: Update:
New civil work has been completed yesterday to replace the original fibre.
And today they have installed a (HUAWEI EchoLife HG8240) for the ONT which has a built in 4 Gigabit port router and two POTS lines.
*Insert big spe*dtest result here*
hamish225:KiwisOnLand: Update:
New civil work has been completed yesterday to replace the original fibre.
And today they have installed a (HUAWEI EchoLife HG8240) for the ONT which has a built in 4 Gigabit port router and two POTS lines.
ONT is not a router, its sort of a fibre modem. you still need to connect a router to the ONT
KiwisOnLand:hamish225:KiwisOnLand: Update:
New civil work has been completed yesterday to replace the original fibre.
And today they have installed a (HUAWEI EchoLife HG8240) for the ONT which has a built in 4 Gigabit port router and two POTS lines.
ONT is not a router, its sort of a fibre modem. you still need to connect a router to the ONT
Look at the stats for HUAWEI EchoLife HG8240.
KiwisOnLand: Ok. They will finish installing on monday and liven it up.
Ill see how they set it up
*Insert big spe*dtest result here*
hamish225: the other ports are for other internet connections and things like TV
KiwisOnLand:hamish225: the other ports are for other internet connections and things like TV
I'm just thinking here - To me that doesn't make sense.
If there is no internal IP (layer 3) routing, wouldn't the manufacturers have made it with one WAN port (fibre) and one LAN port, (as a bridge between the two networks systems).
What is the difference by pluging one of the other LANs into the ethernet port of the TV or into a computer?, both require an IP.
The ONT has only one WAN port (fibre), How can there be other internet connections?
Why would the manufacturers put in two POTS ports, if there is no internal IP (layer 3) routing?
Why would the manufacturers put in four LAN ports, if there is no internal IP (layer 3) routing?
It looks like DHCP on the ONT is disabled by default, so im guessing that a router from an ISP would have a static IP of (192.168.100.x/24) on the WAN side unless they change it on the ONT when they liven it up.
Although that would explain why people would think that a router is needed, since the ISPs are heavily pushing out routers to people.
Zeon: Just an idea here, if its a layer2 device could the ISP not provide a virtual router service with DHCP, NAT etc. from their own equipment? Could be easier to manage?
*Insert big spe*dtest result here*
KiwisOnLand: Ok, What I meant was, why would the ONT have POTS ports that cant be used?
If its only a layer 2 device why would it have stuff that needs layer 3?
The only way I could see them configure it to make it a only layer 2 device is by bridging the WAN to a LAN port,
which in turn bypasses any extra features that it could offer.
Zeon: Just an idea here, if its a layer2 device could the ISP not provide a virtual router service with DHCP, NAT etc. from their own equipment? Could be easier to manage?
KiwisOnLand:
The only way I could see them configure it to make it a only layer 2 device is by bridging the WAN to a LAN port,
which in turn bypasses any extra features that it could offer.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |