Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


linw

2849 posts

Uber Geek


#107496 13-Aug-2012 11:18
Send private message

Got into a discussion about sound being better on HD broadcasts than SD ones.

Is there any difference in quality?

Create new topic
trig42
5809 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

  #671734 13-Aug-2012 11:27
Send private message

Usually, yes.

HD channels play 5.1 audio tracks (assuming programming is broadcast in 5.1), so on those programs, the sound will be a lot better.



Jaxson
8041 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #671738 13-Aug-2012 11:30
Send private message

Yeah, what format are you referring to? Sky HD vs SD or freeview satellite vs HD or freeview HD real HD channels vs non HD channels etc?

Where a program has a dolby soundtrack, this will typically (but not always) sound better then a non dolby soundtrack. If it's a true 5.1 surround sound soundtrack then it will sound better than a programme presented in stereo only etc.

richms
28168 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #671785 13-Aug-2012 12:58
Send private message

I'd actually rate the old analog's nicam digital ahead of the freeview HD for sound quality a little. Less artifactey treble on it.

But AC3 on the channels that do it is better than both.




Richard rich.ms



linw

2849 posts

Uber Geek


  #672062 14-Aug-2012 08:16
Send private message

Thanks, guys. I can take from those answers that, yes, sound is/can be typically better on HD than SD but there are a few variables involved. So that settles the argument.

Sorry, I should have been more specific about the comparison sources. The discussion was about SKY HDi broadcasts in HD v the older non HD SKY decoder with SD only.


ilovemusic
1439 posts

Uber Geek


  #672932 15-Aug-2012 16:50
Send private message

richms: I'd actually rate the old analog's nicam digital ahead of the freeview HD for sound quality a little. Less artifactey treble on it.

But AC3 on the channels that do it is better than both.


Agreed.

Dolby Digital has the technical chops but Nicam sounds more natural.



hdinsider
552 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #673016 15-Aug-2012 20:10

A bit weird that Nicam would sound better than pcm on satellite as the transmitter sites that transmit Nicam are fed from an mpeg 2 stream pcm. But I agree, Nicam sounds great.




don't mess with me.... i'm the hd insider....

hdinsider
552 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #673017 15-Aug-2012 20:12

Both sound better than aac on dtt.




don't mess with me.... i'm the hd insider....

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Niel
3267 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #673099 16-Aug-2012 06:06
Send private message

In general analogue sounds better unless you have a well designed digital audio receiver. All others either are too cheap to do proper post processing, or are top quality that does no processing because it expects a good quality source and not intended to make it sound better.

To explain the last statement, if you buy top quality headphones or reference speakers it will sound bad for general listening because it is designed to produce a flat frequency response while music and movies are processed to sound good on consumer equipment. Hope the point comes across, it was a rough week.




You can never have enough Volvos!


openmedia
3324 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #673114 16-Aug-2012 08:02
Send private message

ACC on DTT still needs fixing. The bitrate etc means the sound is too hollow.

AC3 generally sounds the best, but is annoying when they transmit a stereo source without setting the correct flags so Amps can process it correctly.




Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat APAC as a Technology Evangelist and Portfolio Architect. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.


ilovemusic
1439 posts

Uber Geek


  #675102 21-Aug-2012 13:57
Send private message


To explain the last statement, if you buy top quality headphones or reference speakers it will sound bad for general listening because it is designed to produce a flat frequency response while music and movies are processed to sound good on consumer equipment. Hope the point comes across, it was a rough week.


Disagree !

Really good reference speaker systems will show you the flaws in the source but won't make everything unlistenable.

It's the difference between Wilson Audio and Avalon Acoustics.

Wink

Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.