Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Flippikat

156 posts

Master Geek


#88503 17-Aug-2011 10:31
Send private message

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/connect/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501833&objectid=10745390

From the above article:

"Sky has until the digital switchover in December 2013 to commit to digitalising the four analogue networks shelved when its analogue channels were pulled in March last year. After that it has another two years to implement plans. But Sky TV chief executive John Fellet tipped a decision before the switch.Sky was also considering capacity from digital terrestrial being combined with its digital satellite TV operation to allow more channels.

Fellet said the other option was for Sky to return the frequencies to the Crown. But that seems unlikely given the strategic advantage they give Sky over Freeview."

 

Interesting stuff - if they have 4 UHF networks, there's a huge range of options for them - subscription HDTV, free-to-air "sampler" channels to attract people to the subscription service, maybe even moving Prime to a less-cluttered mux so it can go HD???

Create new topic
sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #507778 17-Aug-2011 10:49
Send private message

While this isn't new news, it is the first we've heard from Sky on the issue for a while now.

Word on the street 2 years ago was that they had entered into negotiations with hardware suppliers to build a network, and they made mention in their submissions to the MED over analogue shutoff that they shouldn't automatically lose their analogue frequencies and they should be allowed to reuse them for DVB-T.




clevedon
1059 posts

Uber Geek


  #507830 17-Aug-2011 12:05
Send private message

  maybe even moving Prime to a less-cluttered mux so it can go HD???


That would be a waste of HD capacity, half the time Prime is home shopping or repeats of TCGW and Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. I would rather NatGeo, History, BBC Knowledge or Discovery go HD than Prime any day.

keewee01
1737 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #507831 17-Aug-2011 12:08
Send private message

clevedon:
  maybe even moving Prime to a less-cluttered mux so it can go HD???


That would be a waste of HD capacity, half the time Prime is home shopping or repeats of TCGW and Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. I would rather NatGeo, History, BBC Knowledge or Discovery go HD than Prime any day.


+1 ... although there is the odd good show on Prime, but yeah - move a more informative channel to HD before Prime.



Flippikat

156 posts

Master Geek


  #507840 17-Aug-2011 12:15
Send private message

sbiddle: While this isn't new news, it is the first we've heard from Sky on the issue for a while now.

Word on the street 2 years ago was that they had entered into negotiations with hardware suppliers to build a network, and they made mention in their submissions to the MED over analogue shutoff that they shouldn't automatically lose their analogue frequencies and they should be allowed to reuse them for DVB-T.



Yeah, I remember reading a while ago that Sky were keen to keep rights over some UHF spectrum post-analogue switch-off. 

From the article it looks like there's some sort of "use it or lose it" condition from Government -  which is refreshing.  

I wonder if anyone out there knows how that's being run, especially with the impending restack of DTV frequencies??

Flippikat

156 posts

Master Geek


  #507860 17-Aug-2011 12:39
Send private message

clevedon:
  maybe even moving Prime to a less-cluttered mux so it can go HD???


That would be a waste of HD capacity, half the time Prime is home shopping or repeats of TCGW and Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. I would rather NatGeo, History, BBC Knowledge or Discovery go HD than Prime any day.


True, but if it saves Sky money in the long term by moving Prime to a Sky mux, they may go for it.
There'd be no need to pay freeview to carry it, for a start..

Kopkiwi
2617 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #509221 19-Aug-2011 21:19
Send private message

Would rather they adopted a viewers choice ala Foxtel with the Premier League.

mthand
148 posts

Master Geek


  #509233 19-Aug-2011 21:57

The idea of paying $20 pm for only all the sport channels on a digital terrestrial transmission is very appealing to me. Of course, they could do that with their current satellite transmission too, but haven't.

An internet capable tv with an internal dvb-t receiver could possibly be set up to authenticate valid subscriptions, without the cost of the decoder.

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Niel
3267 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #509308 20-Aug-2011 10:20
Send private message

They should move all the sport channels to UHF in HD for those that care, and use the freed up satellite space for proper TV channels. I can see us using Fatso a lot over the coming month(s).




You can never have enough Volvos!


nickb800
2715 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #509326 20-Aug-2011 13:06
Send private message

I wonder what the investment horizon on Sky DTT would be, given FTTH will be in place in the next 10 years and might provide a better platform, especially with the trend away from broadcast content towards ondemand

pjamieson
441 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Chorus

  #509922 22-Aug-2011 13:30
Send private message

A bit more detail...  http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5482170/Sky-TV-ponders-alternatives.

Digital terrestrial television was probably only an "interim technology".

rugrat
3106 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #510079 22-Aug-2011 18:06
Send private message

I can't see them wanting to replace most set top boxes, as current ones can't do terrestial according to that article, so that leaves the sky lite option or selling frequencies back to government.

Spyware
3761 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #510080 22-Aug-2011 18:09
Send private message

Current plan is not to use D3 in which case they have no option but to convert all satellite transport to DVB-S2. All SD boxes have to be replaced anyway as can't do DVB-S2 H.264.

P.S. Most of the current SD boxes are also completely obsolete and belong in the bin.




Spark Max Fibre using Mikrotik CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+, CRS125-24G-1S, Unifi UAP, U6-Pro, UAP-AC-M-Pro, Apple TV 4K (2022), Apple TV 4K (2017), iPad Air 1st gen, iPad Air 4th gen, iPhone 13, SkyNZ3151 (the white box). If it doesn't move then it's data cabled.


Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.