![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
How can the CEO not be in front of Parliament right now getting roasted, followed by sacked?
I mean, a government entity gave PII to a company with about the worst track record for privacy and user manipulation.
I can't understand how this doesn't go against their mission statement.
Since we're bashing the IRD for their technical incompetence, I would also like to mention the fact that their notification e-mails (tax return reminders, notice or credit etc.) are sent and signed by a third-party.
That's arguably better than allowing the third party to sign using their domain, but there is really no excuse for any documentation from a government organisation not being signed and unquestionably verifiable as originating from their systems.
To see the lists you've been included on with Facebook advertisers:
Ruphus:
To see the lists you've been included on with Facebook advertisers:
- After logging into Facebook,
- browse to https://www.facebook.com/your_information/?tab=your_information&tile=ads_and_businesses
- Click Advertisers who've uploaded a contact list with your information
Please keep this GZ community vibrant by contributing in a constructive & respectful manner.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
ANglEAUT:Ruphus:To see the lists you've been included on with Facebook advertisers:
- After logging into Facebook,
- browse to https://www.facebook.com/your_information/?tab=your_information&tile=ads_and_businesses
- Click Advertisers who've uploaded a contact list with your information
cokemaster: That’s a useful call out on how to check that. Thankfully I’m not one of the ones that had their info loaded, but ANZ NZ, Shareies, harmoney, AMI, One NZ, Southern Cross, Animates, Wise and Sky TV have targeted me through a list containing my contact information.
There are a bunch of Aussie companies too. I think this might be a wake up call on privacy regulations.
Is this even legal currently? I thought that the privacy act required companies to use personal information only for the purpose that it was collected? Surely giving that information to a third party for marketing purposes would therefore be a breach of the act?
Did I actually "agree" to have any of my IRD information shared with any non-government agency?
Ruphus:
To see the lists you've been included on with Facebook advertisers:
- After logging into Facebook, click on your profile picture and go to Setting & Privacy > Settings
- Click on Accounts Centre
- Click on Your information and permissions > Access your information
- Click on Ads information > Advertisers who've uploaded a contact list with your information
Good stuff Facebook presents a huge list NOT IN ANY ORDER. Just to make it harder for you.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
hasso:
Did I actually "agree" to have any of my IRD information shared with any non-government agency?
The question continues, "and why did anyone inside the IRD thought a complete breach of privacy would be acceptable? How dumb this person/team has to be?"
Should we apply Hanlo's Razor here? "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
alasta:
cokemaster: That’s a useful call out on how to check that. Thankfully I’m not one of the ones that had their info loaded, but ANZ NZ, Shareies, harmoney, AMI, One NZ, Southern Cross, Animates, Wise and Sky TV have targeted me through a list containing my contact information.
There are a bunch of Aussie companies too. I think this might be a wake up call on privacy regulations.
Is this even legal currently? I thought that the privacy act required companies to use personal information only for the purpose that it was collected? Surely giving that information to a third party for marketing purposes would therefore be a breach of the act?
They will all be doing the "hashed data" verification trick to get round the Privacy Act,
They aren't giving you PI out, they are giving out a code that FB can check against its codes to see customers are present on FB, and if they are they will get targeted advertising...
wellygary:
They will all be doing the "hashed data" verification trick to get round the Privacy Act,
They aren't giving you PI out, they are giving out a code that FB can check against its codes to see customers are present on FB, and if they are they will get targeted advertising...
And once they have a match, they can use lookup tables to determine other personal information. So yes, companies are handing personal information to Facebook and this practice needs to stop. Period.
hasso:
Did I actually "agree" to have any of my IRD information shared with any non-government agency?
In my view, no.
Interestingly IRD's privacy policy at https://www.ird.govt.nz/about-this-site/your-privacy/privacy-policy under the section Why you might see a certain advertisement on social media has been updated to read:
"We do not use your personal information when advertising on social media and no longer use custom audience lists on social media. Custom audience lists helped us direct messages to specific customers with relevant information and reminders. We stopped doing this in September 2024."
A few weeks ago when this news broke, the IRD's privacy policy stated this:
"We may also use or disclose your information to third parties to assist us to communicate or market our services to you.
To reach groups of people with information that is relevant to them while protecting their privacy, we sometimes provide hashed and fully anonymised information to social media channels when placing advertisements. In this process, your personal information is treated with the utmost integrity by us. The social media channel is not given any identifiable information. We fully comply with our obligations under the Tax Administration Act and the Privacy Act to protect your personal information."
There was no obvious opt-out functionality available, so I would speculate that IRD simply used our data as they saw fit.
I have raised this matter with both the IRD Privacy Officer and the Minister of Revenue who is supposedly responsible for the IRD. The former is, ahem, attempting to explain, and the latter's office won't comment.
What I find truly baffling is the IRD believe ( or have been convinced) that Socials gets more cut through to taxpayers, than standard communication channels.
I mean IRD have your Address, phone number, and in most cases email. and they have the power of the State to prosecute you if you don't pay them,,,
But they think popping up "targeted" messages to you on FB is a better delivery medium,
TBH it sounds like they are just lazy...
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |