![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
JimmyH: Sadly, the ACCC has a lot more expertise and willingness to go in to bat for consumers than our Commerce Commission, which seems to be a very tame and timid beast by comparison.
Ray Taylor
There is no place like localhost
Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here
raytaylor: I just had a thought...
Does slingshot have the right to outright throttle lightbox and sky to a crawl?
I was reading in the latest net neutrality rules from the FCC that american ISP's are now unable to do that where as some major ISPs over there were outright doing it - in addition to letting peering ports fill up.
If slingshot is now the number 3 isp in the country, what weight does a threat of throttle have against lightbox?
probably not all that much. Most lightbox customers are probably on Spark.
How would that affect lightbox as a business if suddenly 30+% of the potential customer base could no longer reliably use your service?
I am sure loosing speedy lightbox performance is not really of much concern to most slingshot customers, and i dont think slingshot would loose many customers specifically because they couldnt use lightbox.
mdf: What NonprayingMantis said, plus it probably would be illegal in New Zealand. Section 36 of the Commerce Act prohibits taking advantage of substantial market power to muscle out your competition in any market. This obviously isn't specific to net neutrality, but one suspects the Commerce Commission would take a particularly dim view of any efforts in that regard.
And before you ask, there is an exception for IP. You're perfectly entitled to take advantage of substantial market power to muscle out your competition, if you're doing it pursuant to an IP right.
Ray Taylor
There is no place like localhost
Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here
raytaylor: I just had a thought...
Does slingshot have the right to outright throttle lightbox and sky to a crawl?
DonGould:
Have you considered just purchasing everyone of your customers an AppleTV box?
Ray Taylor
There is no place like localhost
Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here
raytaylor:mdf: What NonprayingMantis said, plus it probably would be illegal in New Zealand. Section 36 of the Commerce Act prohibits taking advantage of substantial market power to muscle out your competition in any market. This obviously isn't specific to net neutrality, but one suspects the Commerce Commission would take a particularly dim view of any efforts in that regard.
And before you ask, there is an exception for IP. You're perfectly entitled to take advantage of substantial market power to muscle out your competition, if you're doing it pursuant to an IP right.
I accept its probably a stupid idea... though you have given me another question.
Is an ISP that doesnt offer a streaming media service in competition with a streaming media service itself.
So is there actually competition?
Netflix has no relationship with slingshot, and lightbox is not in competition with slingshot.
In the USA, it is speculated that the throttling with verizon mostly occurred because they offered a streaming platform of their own in competition to netflix.
raytaylor:
Didnt the apple TV boxes have a problem where there was no internal storage?
They would do a 700mb firmware update each time they were switched on?
Have seen that at a couple of customer sites now.
rugrat: In today's press it has that a hearing of the legality of global mode unlikely to be held before December.
I've got the physical press, it's page A11
shk292:rugrat: In today's press it has that a hearing of the legality of global mode unlikely to be held before December.
I've got the physical press, it's page A11
I wonder how many of the NZ streaming services will have folded by then? There might be a reduced pool of litigants
CyberHub - Hosting Made Simple
Web Hosting | Reseller Webhosting | Dedicated Servers | VPS | Colocation | Domain Names | Managed WordPress Hosting
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |