![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
tdgeek:mattwnz:tdgeek:timmmay: Dentistry can be life threatening, infection can spread to the brain and kill. I suspect in that serious a case there may be a capability.
Thats an exception. If we include hernias and dentistry in the health system thats cool, tax will rise for everyone. Or force insurance. Hernais unless there is big pain is not life thrreatening, neither is missing teeth, gum infections, cavities. If any opf these gave rise to an infection, that then becomes a non dental medical issue. I do recall when I had a heart op last year I had to go to the dentist for a test, re your reason above
Or if we collected tax on their overseas companies that trade in the NZ market, but are based offshore as get around paying tax, this would likely more than cover those sorts of costs. I don't think we should have the need in NZ for health insurance, if everyone paid their fair share of tax.
Apple?
joker97: because our health care model seems to be the one of the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff catching people who fell down instead of the one with barriers up the top to prevent people from falling down?
I don't know. i don't understand health care models
Twitter: ajobbins
tdgeek: At the end of the day we have to pay. Its about getting the right and fair treatment, which sets the tax cost. Voluntary insurance has a place, to remove non urgent costs perhaps
tdgeek: At the end of the day we have to pay. Its about getting the right and fair treatment, which sets the tax cost. Voluntary insurance has a place, to remove non urgent costs perhaps
The thing is that dentistry shouldn't be expensive, as essentially you are paying a labour cost, unless you are getting gold fillings. The problem is that is it so expensive that many people don't go, which essentially pushes up the price for everyone else. Also the education costs to become a dentist are very expensive, so they have had to have high fees to cover it.
deadlyllama:tdgeek: At the end of the day we have to pay. Its about getting the right and fair treatment, which sets the tax cost. Voluntary insurance has a place, to remove non urgent costs perhaps
The private system (and private insurance) have their own costs and inefficiencies. They're there to make money, not to make you healthier. Americans spend more money on healthcare, per capita, than anyone else, yet their private, fragmented health system doesn't give them very good results.
My mother (just retired) is a nurse, and has very scathing things to say about the private hospitals in NZ. They do the "easy" operations, and if anything goes wrong, you're on your way into the public hospital where they can handle more serious work.
Health is a hopeless thing to leave to the market. Unhealthy kids don't learn, unhealthy adults can't work. Few people can easily cope with large medical bills. And many problems that are ignored because fixing them costs money, cost more money later. Rheumatic fever caused by rubbish housing, for instance.
JWR:
I don't know why it wasn't in the past. But, it should be now.
mattwnz:joker97: because our health care model seems to be the one of the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff catching people who fell down instead of the one with barriers up the top to prevent people from falling down?
I don't know. i don't understand health care models
Have you watched Michael Moores documentary on the US health system. It will make you glad that we live in NZ. But it looks like the UK and Canadian systems maybe better than ours. In the UK it showed a cashier at the hospital, but they actually gave out money to pay for peoples taxi home.
mattwnz:joker97: because our health care model seems to be the one of the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff catching people who fell down instead of the one with barriers up the top to prevent people from falling down?
I don't know. i don't understand health care models
Have you watched Michael Moores documentary on the US health system. It will make you glad that we live in NZ. But it looks like the UK and Canadian systems maybe better than ours. In the UK it showed a cashier at the hospital, but they actually gave out money to pay for peoples taxi home.
Bung:tdgeek: Scratch hernia repair, thats not covered ny health system now. Unless you are in writhing pain, you need to pay circa 5-8k
Must depend on DHB, neighbour fronted up to his GP with suspected hernia in afternoon was referred to Wgtn Hospital operated on that night and home before lunch next day.
Maybe the sugar taxes some people are promoting could finance more dentistry. Too many rotten teeth are self inflicted by poor diet and lack of cleaning.
JWR:deadlyllama:tdgeek: At the end of the day we have to pay. Its about getting the right and fair treatment, which sets the tax cost. Voluntary insurance has a place, to remove non urgent costs perhaps
The private system (and private insurance) have their own costs and inefficiencies. They're there to make money, not to make you healthier. Americans spend more money on healthcare, per capita, than anyone else, yet their private, fragmented health system doesn't give them very good results.
My mother (just retired) is a nurse, and has very scathing things to say about the private hospitals in NZ. They do the "easy" operations, and if anything goes wrong, you're on your way into the public hospital where they can handle more serious work.
Health is a hopeless thing to leave to the market. Unhealthy kids don't learn, unhealthy adults can't work. Few people can easily cope with large medical bills. And many problems that are ignored because fixing them costs money, cost more money later. Rheumatic fever caused by rubbish housing, for instance.
I agree.
I think the evidence world-wide is that publicly funded health care is both cheaper and more effective than privately funded.
This isn't even an ideological argument in NZ anymore. All the major parties agree on the state providing healthcare.
Of course dental care should be part of the funding.
I don't know why it wasn't in the past. But, it should be now.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |