![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Fred99: It's going to stink - literally. You can't vapourise hair with laser beams without that.
ubergeeknz:Fred99: It's going to stink - literally. You can't vapourise hair with laser beams without that.
Based on what I read about the tech, it just breaks some chemical chain or other, and only in hair. It doesn't burn it.
sbiddle:
Such a product (assuming it works) is a total game changer in this world. The current razor industry is a multi billion business where R&D investment isn't in the millions of dollars, it's in the hundreds of millions of dollars. All of this poses the question - is this product really can deliver it's got the potential to be absolutely massive. How can they only be wanting $160,000? Even their $2 million that they've got is pocket change to many VC companies. Why did no VC company grab a stake when the returns would be massive?
sbiddle: I hadn't actually seen that before and my initial thoughts are that it's potentially one of the best inventions in the last few years.. Which in itself poses more questions that it answers.
Such a product (assuming it works) is a total game changer in this world. The current razor industry is a multi billion business where R&D investment isn't in the millions of dollars, it's in the hundreds of millions of dollars. All of this poses the question - is this product really can deliver it's got the potential to be absolutely massive. How can they only be wanting $160,000? Even their $2 million that they've got is pocket change to many VC companies. Why did no VC company grab a stake when the returns would be massive?
jbard:sbiddle: I hadn't actually seen that before and my initial thoughts are that it's potentially one of the best inventions in the last few years.. Which in itself poses more questions that it answers.
Such a product (assuming it works) is a total game changer in this world. The current razor industry is a multi billion business where R&D investment isn't in the millions of dollars, it's in the hundreds of millions of dollars. All of this poses the question - is this product really can deliver it's got the potential to be absolutely massive. How can they only be wanting $160,000? Even their $2 million that they've got is pocket change to many VC companies. Why did no VC company grab a stake when the returns would be massive?
While I haven't looked in depth at this project a recent trend on the site is that a project often will take a ton of VC/Investment money and then use the Kickstarter as more of a marketing/validation step rather than being required to get to market.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
mattwnz:ubergeeknz:Fred99: It's going to stink - literally. You can't vapourise hair with laser beams without that.
Based on what I read about the tech, it just breaks some chemical chain or other, and only in hair. It doesn't burn it.
I think people would be concerned that it will kill the hair at the root, and whether there are any potential issues with damage to the skin from the laser over a prolonged period. This sort of thing I can imagine needs quite a lot of R&D.
My views (except when I am looking out their windows) are not those of my employer.
Delete cookies?! Are you insane?!
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
timmmay: I'm thinking I'll wait for it to be proven and refined before I splash out.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |