Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


#184058 9-Nov-2015 09:52
Send private message

Uh-oh - something else to worry about, perhaps.

With baked/fried foods, particularly starchy food, there's also acrylamide  (this one was an interesting accidental discovery in chemical plant workers who were working with acrylamide, when tested the levels detected suggested that they'd been exposed industrially to high levels indicating a breach of OSH regulations - but no, they'd just been eating potato chips.  (Acrylamide is the chemical alleged to have been used in "the case of the poisoned professor").

It'd be interesting to know if there's a correlation between frying foods in saturated / polyunsaturated fats and levels of acrylamide formation. It could be if the theory that acrylamide is formed by reaction of amino acids and carbonyls (incl aldehydes - as found above to be related to oil composition in cooking) is correct.

There's been a lot of hype surrounding the supposed "health benefits" of coconut oil.  I suppose this will add further fuel to the fire.

I don't know what to eat for lunch.  



View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79298 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1423520 9-Nov-2015 10:03
Send private message

You can always eat WiFi... Oh, wait.






Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync 




Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1423535 9-Nov-2015 10:30
Send private message

freitasm: You can always eat WiFi... Oh, wait.




RoHS sticker on my wifi - good to go.
Will I extract more goodness out of it if I put it though the NutriBullet?

MikeB4
18435 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1423545 9-Nov-2015 10:51
Send private message

life is a terminal illness. It's never quantity its always quality.



wasabi2k
2096 posts

Uber Geek


  #1423546 9-Nov-2015 10:54
Send private message

So - any links to the actual research anywhere in there?

Just a pretty graph and some cherry picked quotes?

Sensationalised headline and scare-tactics throughout?

Yeah - don't think I will base my nutrition on that just yet.

News Flash:
Eat whole foods - most things in moderation and you will be fine.

Binge regularly on fried food, alcohol, MEAT / whatever the hoodoo ingredient of the week is and you will get cancer and DIE TOMORROW.

kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1423549 9-Nov-2015 11:12
Send private message

wasabi2k: 

Binge regularly on fried food, alcohol, MEAT / whatever the hoodoo ingredient of the week is and you will get cancer and DIE TOMORROW.


60 awesome years or 80 sh!t ones

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1423581 9-Nov-2015 11:38
Send private message

wasabi2k: So - any links to the actual research anywhere in there?



I didn't find a link to a scientific paper, but there is this.
Michael Mosley has presented some interesting stuff in the past.

We're bombarded with claim and counter-claim about supposed health benefit / harm of so many products that it's difficult not to become highly cynical when trying to "make sense" of it all.
Some serious mistakes have been made in the past.  I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss what appears to be a revision of past "common wisdom" about diet and disease, including this. More research is needed.  I'd rather that research wasn't funded by the food industry.


Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1423583 9-Nov-2015 11:45
Send private message

MikeB4: life is a terminal illness. It's never quantity its always quality.


Diseases which are food/lifestyle related (thus potentially preventable) are a serious impediment to "quality" of life at any age.


 
 
 

Trade NZ and US shares and funds with Sharesies (affiliate link).
Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1423585 9-Nov-2015 11:50
Send private message

kiwitrc:
wasabi2k: 

Binge regularly on fried food, alcohol, MEAT / whatever the hoodoo ingredient of the week is and you will get cancer and DIE TOMORROW.


60 awesome years or 80 sh!t ones


Fat kids are having serious sh!t quality lives before they hit their teens - and the future looks even worse for them.


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1423590 9-Nov-2015 11:53
Send private message

I will have to fry my bacon in lard now.


MikeB4
18435 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1423592 9-Nov-2015 11:57
Send private message

Fred99:
MikeB4: life is a terminal illness. It's never quantity its always quality.


Diseases which are food/lifestyle related (thus potentially preventable) are a serious impediment to "quality" of life at any age.



moderation, with everything. 

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1423611 9-Nov-2015 12:17
Send private message

MikeB4:
Fred99:
MikeB4: life is a terminal illness. It's never quantity its always quality.


Diseases which are food/lifestyle related (thus potentially preventable) are a serious impediment to "quality" of life at any age.



moderation, with everything. 


How much acrylamide/aldehydes/nitrosamines constitutes "moderation" and how much is in what we're eating?
I don't know.

The workers found with high levels of (metabolites of) acrylamide were first assumed to have been exposed to levels of the chemical in the plant they were working - far in excess of allowable limits.  But no - it was in the food they were eating, not the result of sloppy industrial practice.  So something's clearly wrong, either the later claims/assumption that those levels are "safe" is incorrect, or the assumption that those levels as a result of industrial exposure were "unsafe" was clearly wrong.  You can't have it both ways.
That one may not be a massive problem (projected/stochastic impact of exposure) vs what would have been the result if the levels of exposure caused more harm than what has been claimed.  In that case, if there was a big "problem" and it needed to be "fixed", then it would have necessitated a massive change in diet - eliminating or greatly reducing intake of staple food (bread etc).
10 or more years later, it's been mainly forgotten.  I wonder if limits for industrial exposure have been increased - I suspect not. 


turnin
509 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1430909 19-Nov-2015 08:39
Send private message

I don't know , I think if we evolved with something bad for us for tens of thousands of years then we either have a fear of it or a coping mechanism.
Anything else is still being tested.

Bung
6490 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1430927 19-Nov-2015 09:21
Send private message

Aren't we irrelevant as far as evolution goes by mid 30's?

jmh

jmh
458 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1430940 19-Nov-2015 09:31
Send private message

Many of the diseases today are related to lifestyle, so I figure I should eat a diet that was around before the current obesity/diabetes epidemic.  That was pretty much, meat, veg and the odd homemade cake every now and again. Processed oils are a new invention, so I tend toward the traditional lard, butter, olive oils and coconut oil, which are minimally processed.  Most of my ancestors lived to their 70's and 80's in reasonably good health and this was before vaccines and antibiotics.  They were probably more active too, so I make sure I exercise and keep a reasonable level of fitness.

The problem with the current science in nutrition and health is that it has been compromised by industry.  If you want to look at the studies, learn how to interpret them and analyse the data yourself.  It's not hard, especially for smart people on this site.  Often the conclusion is not what the data shows, and the resulting press releases that appear around the world are written by corporations or vested interest to push a point of view. You need to read it with a skeptical eye.



jmh

jmh
458 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1430941 19-Nov-2015 09:35
Send private message

Bung: Aren't we irrelevant as far as evolution goes by mid 30's?


The question has been asked, what is the menopause for?  I.e. why do women live once they are infertile?  One possible suggestion is that grandmothers have an effect on the survival of children, perhaps through experience or the ability to care for them when the mothers are off gathering food.

Having more experienced members of the tribe (ie over 40) might lead to greater overall survival.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.