![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
TheUngeek: Oh well.
You can still get ownership history. Then cross check with phone book and electoral roll
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
scuwp: Law changed 1 May 2011. There was a thread on it on GZ from memory, and it was in the media a bit. There was a bit of a public backlash from some interested parties (i.e. Carjam) but it went through anyway.
Owners can also now 'opt out' of their details getting released upon request. You can do that on-line:
http://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicle/registration-licensing/information-who.html
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
freitasm: This is the same reaction we see when people say government shouldn't be allowed into private lives, or to look on your Internet activities, "you don't have anything to hide if you are not doing anything wrong".
Privacy is everyone's right.
freitasm: This is the same reaction we see when people say government shouldn't be allowed into private lives, or to look on your Internet activities, "you don't have anything to hide if you are not doing anything wrong".
Privacy is everyone's right.
scuwp: Law changed 1 May 2011. There was a thread on it on GZ from memory, and it was in the media a bit. There was a bit of a public backlash from some interested parties (i.e. Carjam) but it went through anyway.
Owners can also now 'opt out' of their details getting released upon request. You can do that on-line:
http://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicle/registration-licensing/information-who.html
kingjj:freitasm: This is the same reaction we see when people say government shouldn't be allowed into private lives, or to look on your Internet activities, "you don't have anything to hide if you are not doing anything wrong".
Privacy is everyone's right.
Freitasm you have been highlighting the strict privacy rights in terms of access to the MVR database throughout the discussion, shouldn't that make the ability/need to hide your details from those who are vetted and with purpose not necessary?
I am still of the opinion that the system is mainly used by those with less than desirable intent. Thankfully the Police still have full access.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
TheUngeek:scuwp: Law changed 1 May 2011. There was a thread on it on GZ from memory, and it was in the media a bit. There was a bit of a public backlash from some interested parties (i.e. Carjam) but it went through anyway.
Owners can also now 'opt out' of their details getting released upon request. You can do that on-line:
http://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicle/registration-licensing/information-who.html
I am talking about ownership history. Ie a list of names previously registered to that vehicle. Not names and address
We have been advised against applying for an order for examination as this could go on forever (they could be asked to pay us $10/week). A distress warrant would be preferable and faster, but for this we need to identify what the debtor owns so we can instruct the bailiffs to confiscate it.
Unless we become stalkers and sit outside his house waiting for him to drive in or out, we can't see how we can possibly find out this sort of information.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |