Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28
Jase2985
13739 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6222

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #3326795 1-Jan-2025 13:35
Send private message quote this post

Worst comes to worse, just double up the wires to reduce voltage drop. 




fastbike
450 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 324


  #3326933 2-Jan-2025 09:01
Send private message quote this post

Jase2985:

 

Worst comes to worse, just double up the wires to reduce voltage drop. 

 

 

That's a fundamental misunderstanding of how a CT works. The EVSE will have a large resistor across the terminals so effectively no current flows, therefore there is no voltage drop.
You need to be preventing spurious signals from getting onto the wire.





Otautahi Christchurch


Jase2985
13739 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6222

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #3326940 2-Jan-2025 09:33
Send private message quote this post

fastbike:

 

Jase2985:

 

Worst comes to worse, just double up the wires to reduce voltage drop. 

 

 

That's a fundamental misunderstanding of how a CT works. The EVSE will have a large resistor across the terminals so effectively no current flows, therefore there is no voltage drop.
You need to be preventing spurious signals from getting onto the wire.

 

 

maybe so, but it will need a minimum wire size for x distance. so if the 22-24AWG wire in CAT cable isn't enough, you can just double it up for the distance.




fastbike
450 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 324


  #3326954 2-Jan-2025 10:21
Send private message quote this post

Jase2985:

 

maybe so, but it will need a minimum wire size for x distance. so if the 22-24AWG wire in CAT cable isn't enough, you can just double it up for the distance.

 

 

Further confusion in that answer. If the OP wants to understand how the CT works, and what the requirements are for a long cable to connect to the measuring device, then I suggest reading the linked article.
https://docs.openenergymonitor.org/electricity-monitoring/ct-sensors/extending-ct-cable.html#extending-the-current-transformer-cable





Otautahi Christchurch


wired
191 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 72


  #3326965 2-Jan-2025 10:58
Send private message quote this post

fastbike:

 

Jase2985:

 

Worst comes to worse, just double up the wires to reduce voltage drop. 

 

 

That's a fundamental misunderstanding of how a CT works. The EVSE will have a large resistor across the terminals so effectively no current flows, therefore there is no voltage drop.
You need to be preventing spurious signals from getting onto the wire.

 

 

To expand on the above, a CT is all about current and will try and keep the current flowing in the sensor by raising the voltage until the current flows. So if you have a 60Amp to 10 mA CT then 10 mA will flow when 60 Amps is in the primary. The easiest way to measure the current is to use a resistor (called a burden resistor because it provides a load to the CT) and measure the voltage across it.

 

Sometimes the burden resistor is built into the CT and therefore you can measure voltage directly and little current will flow as fastbike explained. Some other CTs will have a TVS installed to limit the open circuit voltage and for these you need to provide the burden resister. The two types are shown below and varies depending on the size of the primary current.

 

The version that I bought for measuring my house didn’t have the burden resister installed so I suggest you check how your CTs are internally wired.

 

 

 

 

Be very careful when working with CTs and make sure that you do not have any current in the primary while you are working on it if there is no burden resister as the high voltage that occurs is nasty.


SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #3327006 2-Jan-2025 14:12
Send private message quote this post

This does depend on the type of CT; in industrial metering applications they're normally designed for 5A secondary current and therefore need large cables, especially over long distances as voltage drop reduces accuracy. This improves noise rejection.

 

 

 

IOT meter CTs are usually either mV output or tens of mA and will do better on thin wires, but shielding and twisting is more important.


 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
cthombor
86 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 13

Lifetime subscriber

  #3327030 2-Jan-2025 16:07
Send private message quote this post

wired:

 

To expand on the above [response to GeOrge's query about using 40m of existing CAT6 wiring to connect an Evnex E2 to a CT clamp], a CT is all about current and will try and keep the current flowing in the sensor by raising the voltage until the current flows. So if you have a 60Amp to 10 mA CT then 10 mA will flow when 60 Amps is in the primary. The easiest way to measure the current is to use a resistor (called a burden resistor because it provides a load to the CT) and measure the voltage across it.

 

Sometimes the burden resistor is built into the CT and therefore you can measure voltage directly and little current will flow as fastbike explained. Some other CTs will have a TVS installed to limit the open circuit voltage and for these you need to provide the burden resister. The two types are shown below and varies depending on the size of the primary current.

 

The version that I bought for measuring my house didn’t have the burden resister installed so I suggest you check how your CTs are internally wired.

 

 

 

 

Be very careful when working with CTs and make sure that you do not have any current in the primary while you are working on it if there is no burden resister as the high voltage that occurs is nasty.

 



I doubt it'll be necessary to open up the CT to determine whether it has a sampling resistor or is of the TVS variety.  Reading its label should suffice. 

 

If the CT clamp is labelled in amps per volt (e.g. "30A/V"), then it'll have a sampling resistor.  There'll be 4V across its outputs if there's 120A through its primary.  The voltage sensor in the EVNEX unit will surely have a very high impedance -- much much higher than 40m of CAT6 cabling (even if it is CCA rather than copper).

 

If the CT clamp is labelled in amps per milliamp (e.g. "100A : 50mA"), then it has a TVS.  The burden resistance will be in the Evnex unit, and it'll possibly be 22 ohms.  The series resistance of 40m of CAT6 cabling might be problematic, because it'll add to the burden -- possibly causing the CT clamp to overheat (because the current through the secondary will remain constant, but its voltage drop will increase).  Hmm... a roundtrip total 80m of (perhaps) 24AWG, if it is copper, would have a resistance of perhaps (80m)(89 ohms / 1000m) = 7.1 ohms.  That'd be a significant addition to a 22-ohm burden.   That'll increase the phase error and thus degrade the accuracy of the current measurement whenever the power factor of the household supply is not 1.0.    Worse: the CT clamp could overheat or fail, due to the (roughly) 30% increase in the wattage it dissipates in its secondary winding.

 

I found the following note in an installation manual for Enphase IQ Gateway-M monitor.  "The electrician may add as much as three ohms round trip resistance to the consumption CT or up to 1.5 ohms per wire. For reference, the following maximum lengths at 75° C by gauge are: 64 meters of 0.75 mm2 7-strand Cu = 1.5 ohms, 85 meters of 1 mm2 7-strand Cu = 1.5 ohms, 128 meters of 1.5 mm2 7-strand Cu = 1.5 ohms".  This monitor is specified to have a "Production / consumption metering accuracy +/- 2.5%".  The concern about the resistance of the cabling strongly suggests to me that this is a TVS CT clamp.

 

I can readily imagine that noise-injection could also be problematic on long cabling to a TVS CT clamp which is carrying only tens of milliamps of current.   High accuracy certainly isn't required for this application; but if the Evnex unit wildly underestimates the draw from a household that's nearing its supply limit, then ... "Don't try this at home, kids!"

 

My sources:

 

Does this split-core clamp current transformer have a built in burden resistor? : StackExchange discussion indicating how to read the label on a CT clamp.

 

YHDC SCT-013-000 Current Transformer : A Report on the properties of the YHDC current transformer and its suitability for use with the OpenEnergyMonitor system.

 

Enphase IQ Gateway-M Installation and Operation Manual : extending the cabling on the CT clamp for the Gateway-M won't invalidate its  specification, if the cabling has a low enough series resistance.


RunningMan
9193 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4846


  #3327037 2-Jan-2025 16:29
Send private message quote this post

Ge0rge: For those who have had an Evnex E2 installed, what cabelling was used to connect the CT clamps?

 

There's a lot of speculation in previous posts about requirements, but this is the requirements from the manufacturer:

 

7.4kW Single Phase – Residential

 

Customer/Electrician to run a 32A 2C+E dedicated supply cable and a 1-pair or 3-pair (depending on number of phases to be monitored*), overall screened instrumentation cable, ≥0.5mm² and appropriately rated at the max. Voltage present in the switchboard (≥230/400V), between the main switchboard and the charger location. Consult with your electrician regarding supply cable size, (6mm² minimum).

 

 

 

22kW Three Phase – Residential

 

Customer/Electrician to run a 32A 4C+E dedicated supply cable and a 3-pair, overall screened instrumentation cable, ≥0.5mm² and appropriately rated at the max. Voltage present in the switchboard (≥400V), between the main switchboard and the charger location. Consult with your electrician regarding supply cable size, (6mm² minimum).


cthombor
86 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 13

Lifetime subscriber

  #3331046 13-Jan-2025 20:03
Send private message quote this post

RunningMan:

 

[ Ge0rge: For those who have had an Evnex E2 installed, what cabelling was used to connect the CT clamps? ]

 

There's a lot of speculation in previous posts about requirements, but this is the requirements from the manufacturer:

 

7.4kW Single Phase – Residential

 

Customer/Electrician to run a 32A 2C+E dedicated supply cable and a 1-pair or 3-pair (depending on number of phases to be monitored*), overall screened instrumentation cable, ≥0.5mm² and appropriately rated at the max. Voltage present in the switchboard (≥230/400V), between the main switchboard and the charger location. Consult with your electrician regarding supply cable size, (6mm² minimum).

 

22kW Three Phase – Residential

 

Customer/Electrician to run a 32A 4C+E dedicated supply cable and a 3-pair, overall screened instrumentation cable, ≥0.5mm² and appropriately rated at the max. Voltage present in the switchboard (≥400V), between the main switchboard and the charger location. Consult with your electrician regarding supply cable size, (6mm² minimum).

 



Well done!  I'd say we have now definitely answered the OP's question in the negative. 

CAT5e UTP can be 24AWG (i.e. 0.50mm, if solid copper) -- so (unless it is 26 AWG) it has low enough resistance per metre to meet the mfr spec.  However it is unshielded twisted pair, so it completely lacks the 'screen' (a copper braid surrounding the signal-carrying wires) in an instrumentation cable.  The noise-pulses from high-powered equipment switching on and off in the OP's household could thus introduce significant errors into the EVSE's estimation of household kW, even if there's negligible phase error between the current measurement at the (remote) CT clamp and the EVSE's (local) voltage measurement.

(CAT6 UTP has less cross-talk between its signalling pairs, due them being wound around a central core; but it too has no shielding from external noise sources.  However as with the CAT5e its wire gauge is variable; with the 28 AWG cabling being useful only in relatively short runs.)


RunningMan
9193 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4846


  #3331055 13-Jan-2025 20:44
Send private message quote this post

AWG24 is still only 0.2mm² (0.5mm diameter). To get to the minimum spec from Evnex (≥0.5mm²), AWG20 would be needed. Online calculator here.

 

What cable would meet the spec?

 

1-pair or 3-pair (depending on number of phases to be monitored*), overall screened instrumentation cable, ≥0.5mm² and appropriately rated at the max. Voltage present in the switchboard (≥230/400V)


cthombor
86 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 13

Lifetime subscriber

  #3331083 13-Jan-2025 21:51
Send private message quote this post

RunningMan:

 

AWG24 is still only 0.2mm² (0.5mm diameter). To get to the minimum spec from Evnex (≥0.5mm²), AWG20 would be needed. Online calculator here.

 

What cable would meet the spec?

 

1-pair or 3-pair (depending on number of phases to be monitored*), overall screened instrumentation cable, ≥0.5mm² and appropriately rated at the max. Voltage present in the switchboard (≥230/400V)

 



My mistake: the mfr spec is clearly mm squared, not mm!  I have lived in NZ for 26 years now, you'd think I'd be used to the way specs are written here.  My eyeballs and fingers still tell me (very roughly) an AWG for a copper wire; I struggle to estimate sub-mm diameters; and I'd have to multiply to estimate the mm2 of a wire!

So yeah, any use of ethernet cabling would certainly void the mfr warranty.  I'm aware that some in NZ are happy to DIY their household wiring, and I have the impression it's even legal to do this -- you just won't have a certificate of compliance but hey, when I was trying to find a house to purchase in the "Wild West" of Titirangi, it was very rare for me not to spot a deck or extension that was unconsented (and which would surely not be consented in a counterfactual world where somebody had bothered to apply for a retrospective consent).   All to say that I think it's important to make some educated guesses about "what could possibly go wrong" if somebody used a conveniently-located run of CAT5e to hook up a CT clamp to an EVSE...

I'm now thinking that the use of CAT5e in this application could be quite dangerous, because an out-of-spec wiring resistance would introduce a phase error in the current measurement... which might well cause an EVSE to significantly underestimate a household's kW load and "think" that it can safely draw another 7kVA on each phase.  Yikes!  Don't try this at home kids!


HP

 
 
 
 

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
fastbike
450 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 324


  #3340044 7-Feb-2025 00:00
Send private message quote this post

Just had the OpenEVSE installed. It's a really good unit and I will integrate it via MQTT so it throttles with the solar output.
It is so good not to be owned by some crowd that will only hold you captive via a cloud connected device. Apart from the issues of who really owns the kit, the ongoing energy consumption of cloud infrastructure, you seriously need to consider what happens when these companies eventually change ownership.  Look at the cluster that Juicebox became when their ownership changed, and services were down graded without warning.

 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1A6x_oyufg

 

 





Otautahi Christchurch


boosacnoodle
1288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 869


  #3340099 7-Feb-2025 11:18
Send private message quote this post

fastbike:

 

Just had the OpenEVSE installed. It's a really good unit and I will integrate it via MQTT so it throttles with the solar output.
It is so good not to be owned by some crowd that will only hold you captive via a cloud connected device. Apart from the issues of who really owns the kit, the ongoing energy consumption of cloud infrastructure, you seriously need to consider what happens when these companies eventually change ownership.  Look at the cluster that Juicebox became when their ownership changed, and services were down graded without warning.

 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1A6x_oyufg

 

 

 

 

Where did you purchase from? Did your installer give you any grief about AS/NZS compliance?


fastbike
450 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 324


  #3340116 7-Feb-2025 12:44
Send private message quote this post

boosacnoodle:

 

Where did you purchase from? Did your installer give you any grief about AS/NZS compliance?

 

 

Purchased from the web shop. Get a correctly rated switched socket (PDL 56 etc) installed/certified by sparky, with a B type RCD in the distribution board, then just plug it in. 





Otautahi Christchurch


amanzi
Amanzi
1355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 335

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3471094 17-Mar-2026 13:06
Send private message quote this post

We're considering purchasing an EV so am looking at wall chargers. What features should I be looking at when picking a wall charger? Obviously there's the actual charging capabilities (speed, power, etc), but what about other things like charging schedules, Wi-Fi access, etc? I'm not really sure how much logic the wall charger needs versus what the car itself can control? For example, if I want to set a charging schedule to run from 11pm to 7am only, would this be configured on the wall charger or in the car?


1 | ... | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.