![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
joker97: Add 2009+ estima imported of course to your shortlist. You don't have to like it, but at least compare it with the nz new previa which is often overpriced by a leg and a kidney.
Sure, that makes sense, especially if I can find any with the lap/sash belts.
When you talk about the move to a CVT, was that a mid-model change? Wikipedia states the third generation was released in 2006, but mentions a "facelift" in 2009. So is what you're saying that all 3rd generation Previas/Estimas from 2006-sometime in 2009 will have the old 4-speed conventional auto, and all Previas/Estimas since then will have the CVT?
I bought a Mitsubishi Delica D:5 as the family wagon, seats 8 in comfort, easy to drive and you can get models with power everything so sliding doors and boot open and close from the dash controls or the remote fob.
They come in 2WD and 4WD versions and petrol or diesel (diesel model is newer and costs a truck load of $$$)
jonathan18:
Odyssey: surprised at how low the roofline was;
Outlander: confirmed that back row is just not adequate.
Previa/Estima: this definitely was the most adequate in space, both people and luggage (though the MPV was pretty fair for this as well). Closest of the three people-movers to a van, so with all those benefits and disadvantages (but given my father loves his van, this isn't a bad thing for him!).
Anyone have experiences with the Mercedes Vianos?
joker97: The 2.4L old estima previa = 4 speed auto. It's a dog. Bullet proof, but a dinosaur.
New 2009+ has cvt.
The 3.5L (same engine as aurion and highlander) has a 6 speed auto Not sure about new gen. Maybe that's what you want.
My import has lap belts for middle back row. I thought the middle middle seat has a sash. Lol can't remember it has a vast seat in it. Thing with import is every car has a different spec i think it's like subway in Japan you pay for what you want and don't pay for what you don't want.
I won't rule out a cvt because you have no choice all newer jap cars have cvt almost.
Well, the hunt is still on for a vehicle. It has essentially still narrowed down to a Previa, but it seems the less efficient 4-speed auto was still in use in the NZ Previa until after 2009, as confirmed in a call to a dealer selling an '09 model. Previas from 2012 on TM show a marked improvement in efficiency, demonstrating the gear box change happened after 09.
So, it's a matter of either being happy with the 4-speed auto and sticking to my father's original budget ($16k) or getting a newer model but for quite a bit more money. The problem is there are very few Previas for sale generally - the only suitable one in budget from a dealer has sold, leaving about three private sales (which he's not keen on, but may have to revisit). And, while there are lots of Estimas, I'm yet to find one with eight full lap/sash belts, sadly (many even have only seven seats).
A dealer suggested a Prado, given it meets the requirements of eight seats, all with lap/sash belts - but that's a damn big vehicle, with a relatively large and inefficient engine - overkill in this case I think.
Can anyone else think of eight-seaters with acceptable space and lap/sash belts in all eight seats?
Thanks for any further advice.
Yeah, I was hoping to confirm was when indeed the CVT was introduced to the Previa, as I can't find this recorded anywhere. 2009 models show poor fuel economy compared to the current model, suggesting that age still had the 4-speed; indeed, on TM there are two 2012 models, one which shows the worse consumption while the other has the superior consumption - wonder if the CVT came in that year?
TBH, I have been convinced that more recent CVTs aren't the devil's spawn that was in my 2001 Primera; the general rule of thumb appears to be don't touch Nissan CVTs from before the mid 2000s, with the CVTs in relatively recent Toyotas being regarded as pretty good; hence why I'm ok looking at the Previas with CVT - it's just a big jump up in cost compared to say one from 2007-2009.
Estimas are, until I'm proven wrong, are out on the basis of not one I've looked at having eight lap/sash seatbelts.
So, yep, vans may have to be an option, but again they need to be relatively new to ensure eight full belts, and the price for these start in the mid 20ks. Some of the Toyota Vellfire from the late 1990s (eg this and this) have full belts, whereas one has to go to a 2011 Alphard or a 2012 Elgrand to find them. The Hyundai iMax has them (eg this is a lot of newish van for the money), but it's a BIG vehicle, at 5.15 x 1.92 x 1.925m! (Previa something like 4.8 x 1.8 x 1.75.)
At this stage I'll be suggesting the Previa - if he wants to keep within budget, it'll need to be one with the 4-speed auto; if he's happy to spend more, it can be the CVT model. Otherwise, to get what he's after in a van he'll be still looking at mid-20ks anyway, but will have something substantially bulkier.
I don't think fuel economy is going to be the end deciding point, given it's not going to get a huge amount of use - just needs to meet all the other key criteria!
This suggests that, at least in Japan, the CVT in the "Estima" did indeed get introduced in in 2009 - still confused re NZ-new Previa...
http://paultan.org/2009/02/04/toyota-estima-receives-a-facelift-in-japan/
jonathan18:Estimas are, until I'm proven wrong, are out on the basis of not one I've looked at having eight lap/sash seatbelts.
joker97:jonathan18:
Estimas are, until I'm proven wrong, are out on the basis of not one I've looked at having eight lap/sash seatbelts.
I never really thought about lap belts ... The middle seat on the middle row has a full car seat. The middle seat in the back row is fully protected by the middle row (think airplanes).
Anyway i found this not sure what the real data is like
http://www.roadsafetyobservatory.com/Summary/vehicles/seat-belts
Yeah, child seats fixed with solely a lap belt are fine. In fact, even when they are fixed with a three-point seatbelt, given this usually requires the use of a locking bracket, they're essentially only fixed in this dimension anyway. Given the seatbelt holds the child restraint not the child, there's not going to be any of the issues with "seat belt syndrome" that can result from having an actual body restrained with solely a lap belt.
But I'm certainly not happy with anyone in my family using a lap-only belt to strap themselves in.
http://cpsafetycom.azurewebsites.net/articles/lapbelts.aspx
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10366454 While I don't agree with the claim that no seatbelt at all is safer than using a lap belt, I'm still not willing to use them, or own a car with them...
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |