Dingbatt:
Technofreak: Stop talking rubbish. The government isn't double taxing PHEV's. In fact a smart PHEV owner using a PHEV as intended will pay the least of any vehicle owner.
It’s not rubbish. In my use case (I did say it was anecdotal) my round trip to work is 100km. There is no ability to charge at work and the BMW has an all-electric range of 25km (at most). So 75% of the journey is on petrol at 10.9c/km for road tax (5.6c FET + 5.3c RUC). Note I’m only talking road tax here, not total running costs. So I refute your argument that a PHEV in electric mode will “pay the least of any vehicle owner” if you are just looking at the taxes. Any petrol car that uses less than 6.5l/100km will pay less road tax than a PHEV in battery mode.
So once the battery is depleted the PHEV will pay;
- FET
- RUC
Two taxes. Double taxing. Triple taxing if you include the added GST.
Your use case isn't what a PHEV is aimed at. In your situation I agree.
This is why in my opinion precisely why the RUC have set they way they have to discourage this type of use.
Note, I said a Smart PHEV owner. No doubt there are a lot of not so smart PHEV owners out there. The RUC regime may smarten up their thinking.
I quote what I posted in post # 3183196
You're getting a discount, paying $0.53 instead of $0.76. You pay a top up if you do any ICE driving.
If you do anything more than around 70% of pure EV driving you're ahead of both a BEV and an ICE.
A smart PHEV owner will be aiming for better than 70% EV driving, which for many use cases is easily achievable.
My comment was correct when taken in context with the PHEV use case.