![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bung:
The government are looking at doing away with windscreen stickers, how long it that likely to take?
The year is 3265. Waka Kotahi announce a program refresh to eliminate windscreen stickers once and for all with a timeline to complete within 6-12 years.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Bung:
The government are looking at doing away with windscreen stickers, how long it that likely to take?
Idiotic idea, but then its National..
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
rb99:Bung:The government are looking at doing away with windscreen stickers, how long it that likely to take?
Idiotic idea, but then its National..
@rb99
Leave the politics to the Politics sub-forum.
Mentioning you think the idea is idiotic is fine.
Mentioning a party is not.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
rb99:
Idiotic idea, (political jab removed)
I think its a great idea. The transportation of information on a printed form buy people delivering it to you to display, when the only people that care about it already have automated systems to already have that information is IMO idiotic.
You can check the local government rating database with just an address. I see no reason why there should be any privacy issues showing whether a vehicle was current with wof and applicable fees through number plate lookup.
rb99:
Idiotic idea..
Bung:
You can check the local government rating database with just an address. I see no reason why there should be any privacy issues showing whether a vehicle was current with wof and applicable fees through number plate lookup.
https://transact.nzta.govt.nz/transactions/CheckExpiry/entry
Mehrts:
The RUC/Licence/WOF system is already online. NZTA & the police etc already have access to all of your vehicle details without having to look at a label in the windscreen for verification.
Yes, and most overseas countries seem to manage to enforce vehicle registration without relying on a printed sticker. So I totally agree that we should be able to do it here. It would be good to get rid of WOFs while we are at it, Australia and the USA seem to do just fine without them, and vehicle defects make up a very small percentage of crashes over there.
freitasm:
@rb99
Leave the politics to the Politics sub-forum.
Mentioning you think the idea is idiotic is fine.
Mentioning a party is not.
Wilco
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
I think its idiotic because, although it was a few years ago, they did something similar in the UK with ordinary tax disks (or whatever they're called), not RUCs. The result was lots of fines for people who could no longer check whether they were up to date using the simple method of looking at the date on the paper in the windscreen. It also doesn't require an app or t'interweb to check, assuming its working the day you want to check it.
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
rb99:
I think its idiotic because, although it was a few years ago, they did something similar in the UK with ordinary tax disks (or whatever they're called), not RUCs. The result was lots of fines for people who could no longer check whether they were up to date using the simple method of looking at the date on the paper in the windscreen. It also doesn't require an app or t'interweb to check, assuming its working the day you want to check it.
That would be great, except that calendars exist. If people are too inept to remember these things they can write the date on their own label with a sharpie.
rb99:
I think its idiotic because, although it was a few years ago, they did something similar in the UK with ordinary tax disks (or whatever they're called), not RUCs. The result was lots of fines for people who could no longer check whether they were up to date using the simple method of looking at the date on the paper in the windscreen. It also doesn't require an app or t'interweb to check, assuming its working the day you want to check it.
I strongly support the removal of the requirement to display windscreen stickers (all of them).
Little need to carry the deadweight cost of printing them, and posting them.
Little need to carry the environmental impact of their ultimate disposable.
Little need to accept the (admittedly negligible) impact on driver visibility.
As pointed out by others there is already a free public lookup of Rego & WOF at the below link, and RUC range could be added to the list
https://transact.nzta.govt.nz/transactions/CheckExpiry/entry
Generally the laws around potentially abandoned car's need revision , but getting rid of stickers won't impact the amount of information publicly available
Don't assume no sticker means no transaction fee. Clearly $12 is more than it costs to print and post a bit of plastic. Other admin costs will still need to be recovered.
Getting rid of WOF's completely would be a major change, create a new thread anybody wants to discuss it further, but I note that Aussie & the USA do have some inspections required, but the rules vairy by state.
Still don't see any good reason to get rid of them. Worked fine for decades. Not seeing (possible) new system as an improvement. Its just a money saving scheme (not that I'm against saving money, I find it quite handy), but i just don't think its some wonderful new thing.
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |