![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jase2985: you are assuming that every truck driver out there is dishonest
MikeB4: My car will bring up a message on the driver management display telling me it's time for a rest which is good and I always stop for a rest. What would be better is all vehicles fitted with a device that will reduce the power output of the vehicle if the rest brake is not taken
and progressively reduces the power until complied with.
bmt: Got a ticket for 115kph on the Waikato Expressway a few weeks ago. Cop was parked up sideways with his radar gun in between the two opposing traffic lanes:
https://www.google.co.nz/maps/place/Waikato+Expy,+Waikato/
And his view would have been:
https://www.google.co.nz/maps/
There was one other car I could see in front or behind me. Two lanes, large grass median between opposing traffic. I'm such a reckless menace to society :')
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
Haere taka mua, taka muri; kaua e wha.
JimmyH:MikeB4: My car will bring up a message on the driver management display telling me it's time for a rest which is good and I always stop for a rest. What would be better is all vehicles fitted with a device that will reduce the power output of the vehicle if the rest brake is not taken
and progressively reduces the power until complied with.
Providing that the vehicles are heavily advertised as such, so I can make sure I never buy one.
Life is full of annoyances, without having my car nag me as well.
I don't tend to drive long distances, and when I do it's for a reason. The last thing I want is to be miles from anywhere, in deteriorating weather, possibly rushing someone to hospital, and have my car decide to shut itself down because some software engineer thinks they know better than me.
MikeB4:JimmyH:MikeB4: My car will bring up a message on the driver management display telling me it's time for a rest which is good and I always stop for a rest. What would be better is all vehicles fitted with a device that will reduce the power output of the vehicle if the rest brake is not taken
and progressively reduces the power until complied with.
Providing that the vehicles are heavily advertised as such, so I can make sure I never buy one.
Life is full of annoyances, without having my car nag me as well.
I don't tend to drive long distances, and when I do it's for a reason. The last thing I want is to be miles from anywhere, in deteriorating weather, possibly rushing someone to hospital, and have my car decide to shut itself down because some software engineer thinks they know better than me.
It should be mandatory on all vehicles.
Jase2985:MikeB4:JimmyH:MikeB4: My car will bring up a message on the driver management display telling me it's time for a rest which is good and I always stop for a rest. What would be better is all vehicles fitted with a device that will reduce the power output of the vehicle if the rest brake is not taken
and progressively reduces the power until complied with.
Providing that the vehicles are heavily advertised as such, so I can make sure I never buy one.
Life is full of annoyances, without having my car nag me as well.
I don't tend to drive long distances, and when I do it's for a reason. The last thing I want is to be miles from anywhere, in deteriorating weather, possibly rushing someone to hospital, and have my car decide to shut itself down because some software engineer thinks they know better than me.
It should be mandatory on all vehicles.
explain why, instead of just saying it should be
Jase2985: so is the weather, so is poor roads, so is distractions like cellphones, so is poorly maintained vehicles. whats your solutions that that?
do you have statitics on crashes caused by fatigue?
ScuL: Don't get me started on that. I'm used to driving 130km/h on a daily basis and have been doing so for the last 15 years (which is the recommended maximum speed limit in nearly all of the EU).
115km/h is perfectly safe on a dual carriageway with road conditions like that. Sometimes I have to nudge myself not to fall asleep with the low limits in this country, but I manage because I am a strong believer in sticking to road laws. It's just taking a while for NZ to upgrade parts of its key infrastructure to 2x2 120km/h standards. The cars are more than capable of doing so, it's just about filling the gaps in the infrastructure before policy can change. I suspect (and hope) that once the Waikato Expressway is complete past Hamilton we will see an increase to 110km/h if not 120km/h on that road.
trig42: The penalties for logbook violations are quite severe (compared with penalties car drivers get).
I drove a truck here for a while, and when you were stopped for weighing, or just inspection, they looked very hard at the logbook, and were pretty good at picking up irregularities.
Sure, you can fake it, but like with telling fibs, you can easily get caught in your own lies. I never drove more than allocated hours, and my log book was always OK, but I know of others where they had fudged their logbook, but got caught out by hubo readings or other irregularities that proved they were fudging and they got healthy fines (always $1000+) and suspensions, which when it is your job costs a lot more. Truck drivers, generally, see it as something not worth risking I think. Of course there will always be outliers, and those determined to get one over the Man (keeping dual log books for example).
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |