Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic
Mad Scientist
19154 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2490

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2052367 10-Jul-2018 07:00
Send private message

Nissan audited themselves, found the fraud, and self reported as well as recalled vehicles themselves.

Very interesting

It's possible that all car companies do it. Like cheating in sport.




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


512 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 224


  Reply # 2052368 10-Jul-2018 07:01
Send private message

Unsurprising. The GTR is almost ten years old now and still fundamentally the same car it was when it was launched and designed. There would be few performance cars from that development cycle which still meet emissions current emissions rules. 


2756 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 550


  Reply # 2052376 10-Jul-2018 08:01
Send private message

Nissan blew the whistle on Mitsubishi having done this same sort of thing a couple of years back.
That managed to knock quite a lot off the share price of Mitsubishi motors.
Who immediately swooped in and bought up a controlling interest in Mitsubishi motors?
Nissan.




Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler

1425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 375


  Reply # 2052377 10-Jul-2018 08:05
Send private message

I think at this stage its better to try & find who isn't doing it.


2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2052381 10-Jul-2018 08:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

Batman: Nissan audited themselves, found the fraud, and self reported as well as recalled vehicles themselves.

Very interesting

It's possible that all car companies do it. Like cheating in sport.

 

That's something I've heard from industry people. Basically the targets were borderline unachievable, sothe manufacturers were looking at a cheat or get out scenario.

 

So wondering how BMW in particular are going to come out of it.

 

 


5242 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2132


  Reply # 2052391 10-Jul-2018 08:48
One person supports this post
Send private message

GV27:

 

Unsurprising. The GTR is almost ten years old now and still fundamentally the same car it was when it was launched and designed. There would be few performance cars from that development cycle which still meet emissions current emissions rules. 

 

 

Raises the question - why apply emissions standards to performance cars?

 

Small % of fleet and not designed to be efficient.

 

Disclaimer: GTR is my dream car so I may be biased sealed





Mike

7546 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3963


  Reply # 2052442 10-Jul-2018 09:43
Send private message

I've been driving two different make near new vehicles on the same route, similar traffic conditions, same load, driving normally (not trying for maximum fuel economy).

 

One has claimed combined economy of 8.2l/100km.  Actual has been 7.4 open road, 8.5 around town.  Claimed economy seems about right - at least nothing to complain about.
The other has claimed combined economy of 6.1.  Actual has been 7.5 open road, over 8 around town. It seems to be using at least 25% more than claimed.

 

Of course this is pretty meaningless, there could be other reasons, but if smells and looks like BS...


793 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 76

Trusted

  Reply # 2052452 10-Jul-2018 09:53
Send private message

Fred99:

 

I've been driving two different make near new vehicles on the same route, similar traffic conditions, same load, driving normally (not trying for maximum fuel economy).

 

One has claimed combined economy of 8.2l/100km.  Actual has been 7.4 open road, 8.5 around town.  Claimed economy seems about right - at least nothing to complain about.
The other has claimed combined economy of 6.1.  Actual has been 7.5 open road, over 8 around town. It seems to be using at least 25% more than claimed.

 

Of course this is pretty meaningless, there could be other reasons, but if smells and looks like BS...

 

 

For myself, I've found the reported economy (dash) is about .2L/100km better than actual pumped fuel economy, which puts the car over it's advertised economy! Cheeky buggers.


3188 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1230

Subscriber

  Reply # 2052497 10-Jul-2018 10:34
One person supports this post
Send private message

No surprises that they are all falsifying their emissions. As a car that is fully compliant with the rules for NOx emissions will use more fuel than one that cheats the NOx emissions.

Consumers prefer to buy cars with lower fuel consumption. Some countries link car tax to carbon emissions levels. And cars that use less fuel are regarded as better for the environment than cars that use lots of fuel. So of course they will cheat the NOx emissions ratings.

And very ironic with this whole emissions so called scandal. As everyone is basically complaining that carbon emissions from the cheating cars are lower than what they otherwise would have been. Which in turn means that carbon emissions will rise once all of those cars are compliant.





2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2052502 10-Jul-2018 10:49
Send private message

My car has a historic readout for distance, average speed, average economy as well as since-start and since-refuel. I can compare that against my fuel card statement and it seems to be accurate... 

 

According to fuelsaver.co.nz it should average 8.3l/100km. For daily commute it is worse than that, more like 9.5, which I put down to Auckland traffic being inefficiently slow and stop-start. I can smash the manufacturer's claimed economy out of the park for long motorway trips though getting down to 7.0 for a trip to Mt Ruapehu and back, despite all the windy up and down bits. Sitting on the motorway at steady speed is only around 5.0-6.0 - if only one could actually do that for any distance!

 

 


Mad Scientist
19154 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2490

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2052512 10-Jul-2018 11:04
Send private message

NzBeagle:

Fred99:


I've been driving two different make near new vehicles on the same route, similar traffic conditions, same load, driving normally (not trying for maximum fuel economy).


One has claimed combined economy of 8.2l/100km.  Actual has been 7.4 open road, 8.5 around town.  Claimed economy seems about right - at least nothing to complain about.
The other has claimed combined economy of 6.1.  Actual has been 7.5 open road, over 8 around town. It seems to be using at least 25% more than claimed.


Of course this is pretty meaningless, there could be other reasons, but if smells and looks like BS...



For myself, I've found the reported economy (dash) is about .2L/100km better than actual pumped fuel economy, which puts the car over it's advertised economy! Cheeky buggers.



You are Probably estimating fuel amounts within the errors of the filling pump. How do you know to fill to the exact tank level each time? You can't see inside the tank. But these should average out over a period.




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


793 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 76

Trusted

  Reply # 2052514 10-Jul-2018 11:07
Send private message

Batman: You are Probably estimating fuel amounts within the errors of the filling pump. How do you know to fill to the exact tank level each time? You can't see inside the tank. But these should average out over a period.

 

Fuel card statements over time.


Mad Scientist
19154 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2490

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2052518 10-Jul-2018 11:17
Send private message

.2 is channelled to your exhaust afterburner / afterfire




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.